Well, the later ones do. Back in the 50s, and even into the 60s, they still remembered that a very important part of filming a musical was that it is in fact a musical - a performance that requires all concerned to actually be able to sing. Really sing, not just burble along more or less in tune.
The Madonna Evita sucked, because she wasn't a good
(
Read more... )
Comments 9
And I take it you haven't seen the version of Phantom of the Opera that has Sarah Brightman as Christine and Michael Ball as the Phantom?
Reply
I've never seen Phantom live, but I have the original London cast soundtrack recording and that IS good. I'd hoped that the movie would be decent, but I was sadly disappointed.
Reply
Javert in this is perfect IMO. Strong deep beautiful voice, severe and deep convictions, simply wonderful. Adult Cosette in this I believe is a miscast, but she's the only one I can really point to and say "I disagree with this."
I could swear I've seen the Sarah Brightman/Michael Crawford version(my mistake in saying Michael Ball earlier, he was one of the singers in Les Mis) on tv if not owned the DVD. I am unable to find it, but it matches the original London cast.
Reply
That Javert was the Australian one :) Unfortunately the original Oz Valjean, Normie Rowe, got replaced by Rob Guest (who should have been shot before being allowed to take that role. Idiot seemed to think you show emotion by shouting).
I was wondering who the heck Michael Ball was ;) Michael Crawford astounded me. I grew up on Brit sitcoms, and all I knew of him was Frank Spencer in Some Mothers Do 'Ave 'Em. (If you've EVER seen it, the idea of THAT as the Phantom was utterly ludicrous...)
Reply
And yes, when we go to see a muscial, it's for the overall talent of those appearing, not for the name of the people involved. But then, back when musicals were really good, those acting in them were jacks-of-all trades. They could sing and dance and act. That's not what those casting musical films are worried with these days.
For the record, I thought Emmy Rossum was great in Phantom but casting Gerard Butler as the Phantom was a stroke of sheer stupidity.
Reply
Gerard Butler should not have been the Phantom. They'd have done far better with Hugh Jackman (who is a damn good singer - I've heard him as Curly in Oklahoma!) or even dragging any professional tenor in off the bloody street.
It's the curse of growing up in a musical family - I got to be not-quite-professional on trombone, and a reasonable choral singer. I don't have the voice for professional singing, alas.
Reply
We saw a touring production of Les Mis some years ago, and we were very lucky- they were cast with operatic-quality voices, with the exception of the adult Fontine. She had an Ethel Merman brassy voice, and that also worked beautifully.
What really disappoints is some musical movies that were made in the sixties that don't even hold up to the energy and musical verve of really good amateur theater. I utterly cannot *stand* the Gene Kelly-directed Barbra Streisand "Hello Dolly." I left the exclamation mark off, because the movie had nothing to exclaim about. And how Kelly managed to make a movie with Walter Matthau dull, I will never understand.
And I loved Fred Astaire in lots of movies, but not in Finian's Rainbow. Darn it. And the guy who played Og didn't have the chops.
In both cases, I've seen better amateur productions.
Laura
Reasonably good choral singer.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment