I keep intending to update this journal more comprehensively, and yet never quite getting around to it. The corners of my mind are crowded with half-constructed, time-discarded malformed little lj-entry ideas that were never allowed to develop. They scritch with their little fingernails at me from the darkness, reminding me that I promised myself I
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
Reply
Reply
I rather liked RDJ's interpretation of Holmes, mostly because I always read Holmes as a titchy cocaine addict who may or may not have an eating disorder. Calm mien? Not in my mental image of the character (but then I've never seen movie interpretations of Doyle's books--except for The Great Mouse Detective). I got the sense that Holmes' brain was always working, always deducing, not quite revealing, as I thought was appropriate.
I seriously think Jude Law was the best part of the movie. Words cannot express how much I loved his take on Watson. (Especially in that he wasn't a good-natured dufus.)
Personally, I didn't like Irene Adler. As a character, she was fine, but poor Rachel McAdams was so wrongly cast for the role it made me cringe and I simply couldn't get past that. Femme fatale she is not.
Reply
I definitely think Holmes was both calm AND twitchy--just underneath. He was very clinical. An eccentric scientist, yes, but British after all. And as you say "always working, not quite revealing"--while as Downey's Holmes' brain is always going AND it all comes through on the surface.
You should watch The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes:
http://www.hulu.com/watch/46175/the-private-life-of-sherlock-holmes
it's campy but (and?) I think does a very good job with what it sets out for. That's the kind of twitchy-but-calm Sherlock I mean, although he could, in fact, stand to fisticuff a bit more.
Reply
Leave a comment