Oh my fucking god, Jezebel.com

Jul 07, 2010 06:06

I am seriously now officially glad to have been banned from there for protesting some of their other content earlier ( Read more... )

feminism, internet, rant

Leave a comment

Comments 7

dangermousie July 7 2010, 13:55:47 UTC
Heh. I love jezebel but not for its supposed feminism but because they are my trashy gossip site of choice :)

Side note - their insistence that if you are skeletally thin or morbidly obese it's still OK healthwise drives me insane. Yes, being somewhat overweight or underweight does not present any problems. However, if you are 300 lb or 80 lb, guess hat - you have health problems. /end rant

Reply

katranna July 7 2010, 14:22:27 UTC
Well it might be ok healthwise, at least in the sense that if you're 300 lbs it doesn't mean you're gonna keel over any day, and if you're 80 lbs but small, it doesn't mean your periods are about to stop, either. It might mean that, or not. Or it might mean you're recovering from cancer/any other ailment, and so your size is a symptom of other things that are being treated and taking precedence at the time, and is not the issue in and of itself.

Reply


a_priori July 7 2010, 14:07:23 UTC
I didn't know you were banned there. Do you mind telling the story?

Reply

katranna July 7 2010, 14:53:48 UTC
Well, they have this "snap judgment" feature, which is basically a photo they put up without any text to go along with it for discussion. I noticed that over a span of several days, most of the photos put up went something like: cheerleader, ballerina, ballerina, model, dancer, celebrity in a pretty dress, gymnast. (I can't find all of them now so have another random snap judgment photo.) I found it irritating that despite the almost incessant features on size acceptance etc going on at the time, pretty much all the women they chose to feature were conventionally pretty, slender women, generally in conventionally attractive, feminine poses, of the kind I'd expect to see on any other website. Many of them were athletes, but again, the athletes they chose to disproportionately feature at the time were ones that, skilled as their bodies are, are ones whose art/sport involved in a primarily aesthetically pleasing presentation of the body. (I wouldn't say that a gymnast's sport involves an aesthetic presentation of the body in the same ( ... )

Reply

a_priori July 8 2010, 01:51:13 UTC
It sounds like they're not very interested in a conversation unless the conversation is intended to agree with whatever they have already said.

Reply

katranna July 9 2010, 04:58:50 UTC
Apparently. I dunno, many of the comments on this article are plain-out saying "this content does not belong here," and they haven't been banned for "complaining about what we choose to post."

http://jezebel.com/5582641/i-want-you-to-look-at-my-tits-because-theyre-fabulous

Although one commenter does follow up her post with "don't ban me." There's basically no real standard.

Reply


sinclair_furie July 7 2010, 15:24:55 UTC
Yeah Jezebel.com is kind of a disaster :/

Reply


Leave a comment

Up