Leave a comment

Comments 2

allisontooey August 15 2011, 01:15:45 UTC
Your friend's comment was hilarious.

I'm curious; was Waltz's performance better or worse than his part in "Inglorious Basterds?" He seems like he's got potential as an actor.

Reply

kaye_spivey August 15 2011, 02:01:36 UTC
Oh, he was good in Inglorious Bastards... :)
I think overall Inglorious Bastards allowed him to be MORE deliciously evil. In this one he was very good at being not quite in his right mind and was convincingly in love with his wife, even though he was cruel. He was definitely not worse in Water for Elephants, but I think I may still give the edge to Inglorious Bastards.
He is definitely a fantastic actor.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up