I just got a comment on a three-year-old entry! Who loves me so much that they are obsessively reading back through my journal to find tiny errors that need correcting.
Ligeti's Volumina The commenter says:
I don't think serialism was in any way involved in the composition of this piece, just because its not tonal does not render it serialist.
(
Read more... )
Comments 10
Reply
Reply
I can't help feeling that really they were just advertising their own cleverness. To me, they also advertised their own dickness.
Reply
Reply
However, this bit:
Volumina is about as avant-garde as you can get without going right beyond music and breaching the Geneva Conventions. The mere performance of this piece has actually destroyed two organs, and caused a complete electrical failure in the Royal Festival Hall.
It is one of those things which, a bit like perforating your cheeks with a stapler, is really nice when it stops. But after a few listens it does grow on you. At times you just want to laugh out loud and shake Ligeti by the hand for being such an outrageous fucking nutcase. I can see him sitting there, scoring a particularly horrific discordant serialist assault on the senses, chuckling to himself and scribbling in the margin, "That'll shit them right up."
... reads like the kind of stuff Neal Stephenson would write if reviewing a piece like this. Nice one.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment