Aww, I didn't know you were at FCN...if I would've known, I would've liked to have at least said hello. And I agree with you on how furs sometimes see things. It's now reaching the point where, and this is especially true with some of the more well-known furs, if you don't agree with someone's views unconditionally, then you're causing drama and/or an asshole that deserves to be scorned by everyone else. I don't get it either.
Yeah, would have been nice seeing you. I did have a good time, just some drama over someone who had an issue when they were told that because of the rules we all agreed on in our relationship that because 1). two of us didn't really know them, and 2). they had played with someone whose rep/safety/etc is questioned (by all three of us) that any type of play was not on the table. That has been pretty common here lately.
Was good seeing you two as well. Maybe someday we will make a non-con trip up that way and get to spend some time. I'm giving AC a skip. So, next I'll see you is when you guys make the trip you hinted at this way. Lets hope its not an SCA weekend LOL.
I don't have a problem with Christians or Christianity or anything like that. Or any other religion. With the exception that I don't want it to affect me. I think that's fair, right?
I think thats my point. Because I'm not in the closest model to a classic marriage that guys can have: ie two people in a monogamous committed relationship. Instead I am in a committed relationship that is open _to a limited extent_ & _under certain circumstances_, certain furs think that they have rights to whatever they want. Some poor excuses for anthropomorphic entities need to learn the difference between online/fantasy and RL as well. Cyber play is not something we regulate, but it _does not_ auto translate into real face-to-face. Nor does flirting mean a promise to anything. I have my own beliefs and codes. Pagan Celtic cultures generally allowed for as many spouses as you could care for (though this did vary tribe to tribe...) The standards I live by have little to do with the gay, furry, and ignorant behaviors I see around me and am speaking on. But, it seems some see 'non standard' as 'free to all'. I find the behaviors to be in poor taste to down right offensive.
Ahh the drama... Hoping to make a trip out there in the not-too-distant future. Will depend on things here of course, but I'm hoping for May or early June.
Comments 7
Reply
I did have a good time, just some drama over someone who had an issue when they were told that because of the rules we all agreed on in our relationship that because 1). two of us didn't really know them, and 2). they had played with someone whose rep/safety/etc is questioned (by all three of us) that any type of play was not on the table.
That has been pretty common here lately.
Reply
Reply
Maybe someday we will make a non-con trip up that way and get to spend some time.
I'm giving AC a skip. So, next I'll see you is when you guys make the trip you hinted at this way. Lets hope its not an SCA weekend LOL.
Reply
I don't have a problem with Christians or Christianity or anything like that. Or any other religion. With the exception that I don't want it to affect me. I think that's fair, right?
Reply
Because I'm not in the closest model to a classic marriage that guys can have: ie two people in a monogamous committed relationship. Instead I am in a committed relationship that is open _to a limited extent_ & _under certain circumstances_, certain furs think that they have rights to whatever they want. Some poor excuses for anthropomorphic entities need to learn the difference between online/fantasy and RL as well. Cyber play is not something we regulate, but it _does not_ auto translate into real face-to-face. Nor does flirting mean a promise to anything.
I have my own beliefs and codes. Pagan Celtic cultures generally allowed for as many spouses as you could care for (though this did vary tribe to tribe...) The standards I live by have little to do with the gay, furry, and ignorant behaviors I see around me and am speaking on. But, it seems some see 'non standard' as 'free to all'. I find the behaviors to be in poor taste to down right offensive.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment