Batman

Jun 17, 2005 21:43

Okay.. So I'm a day late on the Batman review, since even my mom seems to be throwing out their thoughts on this movie ( Read more... )

movies

Leave a comment

Comments 2

pbmmiah June 19 2005, 10:34:50 UTC
Agreed with your post, but there is also another reason that was needed in saving the franchise, and that was hiring a good director who clearly understood the origins of Batman and what the whole concept and character is about. Getting Nolan to do this was a very smart choice. Burton did a supreme job as well (although one can argue his two films weren't nearly as much of an origin story as Nolan's), but Suck-macker drove the franchise directly into what you called it...cartoonish and overtly lame. I believe the tone begins with the writing and directing and is executed by the cast. Nolan brought the right kind of tone to bring Batman back to
respectability.

I do think the film will do well. I predict a total gross of about $80-100 mill when all is said and done. Maybe I'm undershooting that, I don't have recent gross figures on hand. But, my point is, I think it will do fairly well this summer, until.....

War of the Worlds come out.

great post.

Reply

kittlesnbits June 19 2005, 11:57:50 UTC
Thanks for the props.. great comments..
Word has it that It's already tipping $70 mill.. which is good.. but not great.. I'm just ballparkin' but, I think they'd consider this a success with a $200 mill US domestic gross ($175M minimum). And they might even think of THAT as somewhat of a disappointement, considering Spiderman was over $375M.

I just don't think this Batman is a digestable for people as the Spiderman flicks have been. It stomps on Spiderman as far as quality and plot, but there was a universality about the bug-boy movie that people enjoyed.

Next week's ticket sales will be the key to seeing whether we can consider this movie a financial let-down or not.

Hey.. I might be catchin' ya at MuskegoN! I hope!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up