I am Back

[kkboy]

Hello people

Comments

[mtxoracle]

hes not soliciting your pictures. hes destributing pictures of you... your pictures arent prostitutes. Ither way this kinda sucks from your point of view. GL

[garnet_ankh]

They also claimed "deflamation of character".

Um, dont you sign that away when you do porn?

Not that it matters... I'm tired of the whole thing.

[mtxoracle]

haha deffamation is going to be a hard sell to a judge...

[kkboy]

You will not get rid of drama since you cause your own drama-- and you admitted it yourself

[mtxoracle]

I have been gone too long this sounds interesting... hmm..

[flagette]

some people are successfully able to pass porn off as an art, so defamation of character might be plausible if he has a stupid judge.

When you do porn, it's kind of FOR the purpose of people seeing it, so when people see it i can't imagine why you would get angry about it.

-Aaron-

[jaded_lantern]

I want to do porn.
I don't want to do porn for free.

In porn, you'd authorize the release of your work before you get paid.
I didn't get paid, I didn't sign any release.
I didn't consent to my pictures being made public like this.

The biggest issue is that I didn't get paid for it.

I didn't put them on a share-program, some crazy out-of-state asshole did.
From Wisconsin, New York, Tennessee, Virginia, or Ohio.
I don't know who did it, but I don't trust any of them anymore.

[mtxoracle]

that retarted. so you dont care about your character being blemished, you care about getting paid for it. okay thanks for proving my point.

[mtxoracle]

some people are successfully able to pass porn off as an art, so defamation of character might be plausible if he has a stupid
judge.

but he clearly dosnet care about that.