John Hodgman:I have confidence that, in no short order, Prop 8 will be repealed, and the gay marriage debate will look as absurd at the miscegenation debates of the 20th century do now. I have confidence this will happen not because it is merely right, or because the electorate will suddenly love gayness, but because opposition to gay marriage has
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
Reply
Reply
I find the situation rather facinating due to it's irony. My personal feeling is to make everything a civil union. EVERYONE LOSES. Basically, in the eyes of the law, you change the wording from "marridge" to "civil union" and then let anyone do it who wants to. :D
If you want to get "married" then do so in a Church. The State shouldn't even care.
In any event, if the voting population votes for something, is it not ALSO our duty to consider their wishes? Just to play Devil's Advocate (see opinion above).
Notably, I believe Obama doesn't support gay marridge. Or does, kinda. Or something. ^^
Reply
Obama supports civil unions, but not gay "marriage." The word "marriage" is too politically charged... I (and BHO) think we should just establish civil unions with all the same legal benefits that married couples receive and let it be done.
I did not get married in a church. We purposely removed all references of god from our marriage ceremony. I would have been equally happy with "civil union."
Reply
Reply
FWIW, you and I are (surprisingly) in agreement on this. Regardless of why you want to be called married (Jeebus Said So, your union has been sanctified by Bippy the Wonder Trout, or just because you want to say you are), the state shouldn't care.
He doesn't support gay marriage. It's an area where he and I differ. (In fact, his opinions re: gay marriage are almost exactly the same as GWB's.)
Reply
Leave a comment