He was a criminal. Not even licensed as a medical practitioner, he practiced an illegal procedure without a medical license and blatantly did so on national television.
… And yesterday it was announced that for his deeds he would receive The Order of Canada: Canada's highest honour, reserved for Canadians who have demonstrated a "lifetime of
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
Reply
"Not even licensed as a medical practitioner, he practiced an illegal procedure without a medical license and blatantly did so on national television."
True: Abortion was illegal
False: He worked in Montreal as a general practitioner for nearly twenty years
Now, that, coupled with the laws of a democracy (Of course the descision was not unanimous: A democracy works based on a majority, unanimous descisions are not needed) state that what he did was set the country up to progress in terms of laws and ideas.
The country's medical system is what has stalled and not introduced anything new since 1988.
Reply
Regarding unanimity, every other recipient of the award has been unanimously agreed upon and been a Canadian that all other Canadians can respect and honour. Many wonderful nominations have been turned down in past decisions, and it strikes me as highly backhanded for such a highly contested individual to be granted an award when the result is to bring further division among Canadians.
Which majority are you speaking of? The majority on the board passing the decision? Or the majority of Canadians? When given the opportunity to speak in various newspaper polls on this subject, Canadians showed a tremendous divide - far from a unified voice in support and far from a majority in favour of such an award being granted.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment