Term Paper of Doom cont'd
Continuation of Part I:
A good manager must have the ability that let the suitable person at their fit position (I can't decide if she's talking about sex or something else.), to do this can let the company use the personal resource as well as it can. It is also good for the relationship between having a sense of mission, and taking responsibility for things that happen rather than passing the buck." ( <--- what the fuck is that???
For the analytical, problem-solving and decision/judgmant-maring (????????????) skills, the explain on the book is that "managers concern themselves with decison making. Therefore, they must develop with uncertainty. They need also to strike a balance between allowing subjective feelings to guide them without completely throwing out objective logic." (Siciliano, Gene, p76) O_O;; Oh no, she cited a source! ;_; It's like she's saying her sources don't know how to write. -_-;;
And for the social skills and abilities, there said "Managers need interpersonal skills to communicate, delegate, negoitiate, resolve conflict, persuade, sell, use, and respond to authority and power..." (Siciliano, Gene, p77) I don't trust this Siciliano person anymore, kthx.
From the book, somebody think, if to keep a leaning habits the person can have the "helicopter mind" (...........is it a bad thing for me to say that this girl could be a drug addict? The only kind of plant that I can think of that can give you such a mind is marijuana. XDXDXD)- "successful managers learn independently, they take responsibility for the rightness of what they learn, rather than passively depending on an authority as well as concretely. They relate concrete ideas to abstract ones (and vice versa) rather quickly. This ability, sometimes known as a 'helicopter mind,' enables them to generate theories and to develop their own practical ideas." (Anthony D' Souza, p28) Oh god no... another source... T^T
How leaders use their power affects both the productivity of the group and the freedom of the subordinates. If they use less authority and power, the group members gain greater freedom in decions-making. When they use more power, the freedom of the group will be declines (GAH! And it was going so well until THAT part!!! *flails*). This diagram is relates different kinds of leader behavior to the balance of power between leaders and group members (I'm trying not to be too snarky and say that this girl probably wrote her term paper in her native language and then used Babel Fish to translate it to English...). The pattern of the leader behavior may range from "group-centered" depending upon whose assessment of the problem, interests, experience, and motivation dominates the decision.
At authors' minds. What the personality of managers might be own? (Own what? The plant? The helicopter mind? I'm gonna start a band and call it Helicopter Mind now... XD Or we could be called "Pot Sessions" and our first single would be "Helicopter Mind"... *nods* Yes.)
For the value system, leaders need to think about these questions: how strongly do they feel that individuals should share in decision-making? How convinced are they that the officials paid or chosen to assume responsibility should personal carry out the burden of decision-making? What relative importance do they attach to organizational efficiency and person growth of subordinates?
As a leader in the company, he must lead others to create their own trademark, which is also means the "enterprise civilization". It's the "goods" that only can be produced at "my" company and others can not copy. This goods must be provided it's distinctive style. For example, every one is know Macdonals' (At this point, I've really stopped hoping these are just typos... *shakes head sadly*) in the world, at the begin there unavoidably have many other "fast food" want to copy it's operation, but why until now there is don't have many becomes successful as Macdonals'? It is because Macdonals' have their "enterprise civilization". Macdonals' owner provide that every worker must give the best service to the customer, and they have a very rigorous provide for their foods, like the fried potato (*dying inwardly* I hope you don't look like a potato, darling, or I'd fry you for effectively frying my brain.), they used the potato's starch content must lower than definite criterion and the oil they used must be toppled after a few hours, if the food haven't be sold at one cay, they can't be sell anymore (In other words: QUALITY CONTROL! Gosh, I'm so proud that I understood this part. XD). What do you get form here? Does your company have enterprise civilization? (Not only that, we also speak good English. =P)
A good manager must have the ability that let the suitable person at their fit position (I can't decide if she's talking about sex or something else.), to do this can let the company use the personal resource as well as it can. It is also good for the relationship between having a sense of mission, and taking responsibility for things that happen rather than passing the buck." ( <--- what the fuck is that???
For the analytical, problem-solving and decision/judgmant-maring (????????????) skills, the explain on the book is that "managers concern themselves with decison making. Therefore, they must develop with uncertainty. They need also to strike a balance between allowing subjective feelings to guide them without completely throwing out objective logic." (Siciliano, Gene, p76) O_O;; Oh no, she cited a source! ;_; It's like she's saying her sources don't know how to write. -_-;;
And for the social skills and abilities, there said "Managers need interpersonal skills to communicate, delegate, negoitiate, resolve conflict, persuade, sell, use, and respond to authority and power..." (Siciliano, Gene, p77) I don't trust this Siciliano person anymore, kthx.
From the book, somebody think, if to keep a leaning habits the person can have the "helicopter mind" (...........is it a bad thing for me to say that this girl could be a drug addict? The only kind of plant that I can think of that can give you such a mind is marijuana. XDXDXD)- "successful managers learn independently, they take responsibility for the rightness of what they learn, rather than passively depending on an authority as well as concretely. They relate concrete ideas to abstract ones (and vice versa) rather quickly. This ability, sometimes known as a 'helicopter mind,' enables them to generate theories and to develop their own practical ideas." (Anthony D' Souza, p28) Oh god no... another source... T^T
How leaders use their power affects both the productivity of the group and the freedom of the subordinates. If they use less authority and power, the group members gain greater freedom in decions-making. When they use more power, the freedom of the group will be declines (GAH! And it was going so well until THAT part!!! *flails*). This diagram is relates different kinds of leader behavior to the balance of power between leaders and group members (I'm trying not to be too snarky and say that this girl probably wrote her term paper in her native language and then used Babel Fish to translate it to English...). The pattern of the leader behavior may range from "group-centered" depending upon whose assessment of the problem, interests, experience, and motivation dominates the decision.
At authors' minds. What the personality of managers might be own? (Own what? The plant? The helicopter mind? I'm gonna start a band and call it Helicopter Mind now... XD Or we could be called "Pot Sessions" and our first single would be "Helicopter Mind"... *nods* Yes.)
For the value system, leaders need to think about these questions: how strongly do they feel that individuals should share in decision-making? How convinced are they that the officials paid or chosen to assume responsibility should personal carry out the burden of decision-making? What relative importance do they attach to organizational efficiency and person growth of subordinates?
As a leader in the company, he must lead others to create their own trademark, which is also means the "enterprise civilization". It's the "goods" that only can be produced at "my" company and others can not copy. This goods must be provided it's distinctive style. For example, every one is know Macdonals' (At this point, I've really stopped hoping these are just typos... *shakes head sadly*) in the world, at the begin there unavoidably have many other "fast food" want to copy it's operation, but why until now there is don't have many becomes successful as Macdonals'? It is because Macdonals' have their "enterprise civilization". Macdonals' owner provide that every worker must give the best service to the customer, and they have a very rigorous provide for their foods, like the fried potato (*dying inwardly* I hope you don't look like a potato, darling, or I'd fry you for effectively frying my brain.), they used the potato's starch content must lower than definite criterion and the oil they used must be toppled after a few hours, if the food haven't be sold at one cay, they can't be sell anymore (In other words: QUALITY CONTROL! Gosh, I'm so proud that I understood this part. XD). What do you get form here? Does your company have enterprise civilization? (Not only that, we also speak good English. =P)