My hypothesis.

[l0ser18]

So a week or so ago, I was talking to Alia about boys. What else is new? (Actually, I had very successfully dodged talking about boys for pretty much the entire months of September and October. So ha. To all those who have seen the drawing I make of my brain- let's just say it got very jumbled

Comments

[rebbles]

at the risk of sounding REALLY nerdy, i'd say that the average age of everybody i've been attracted to has been about my age, maybe a bit older, if you measure it by how many years apart they are from me at the time of me liking them. so no, your theory's sort of flawed. but what theory isn't?

but i've also decided that i'm 90% sure that no one at fox lane is worth being attracted to anymore. time to go to college!

but your theory TOTALLY works for you.

love always!

[l0ser18]

But weren't you like... normal? I definitely thought you were (in a physical maturation sense. In a mental sense, never ;) )Because then it would still hold true.

but i've also decided that i'm 90% sure that no one at fox lane is worth being attracted to anymore
Agreed, but when you think about boys, you are not thinking about college. Or people whose names begin with C and end with harna. Or a combination of the two.

[rebbles]

oh, you mean puberty normal? in terms of that, yeah. your theory would make sense then. i thought you meant normal boy-wise. because as you say: mentally, never! but i do want to go to college! i need a new playing field.

[l0ser18]

yeah I mean puberty normal. That's where I've always heard the phrase "late bloomer" used so I guess I assumed that's what other people have always heard too.
yes I think we ALL need a new playing field.