In response (happier journal entry above)

Jul 14, 2006 01:30

-{Quoted by "anonymous" as a reply to my last journal entry ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 8

sarl0ck July 14 2006, 14:04:04 UTC
As posted earlier, I don't know the exact person who's pulling it, but I know which group it's coming from. And yes, Chantal King is involved in said group. If I had IP addresses, I could likely find out who's doing it, but really, it doesn't matter.

Reply


berses July 14 2006, 17:58:55 UTC
Maybe we could just decide that each side of this has made their point, and leave it at that?
And we are Chantal King's friends, Chris, not her "group."

Reply

sarl0ck July 16 2006, 11:23:43 UTC
See my reply to Chantal.

Reply


lamar0 July 15 2006, 00:17:47 UTC
Damned concience... So maybe that edit was a little harsh. Sorry Bamber, I know you're right, I should stop while I'm not even ahead... but I just can't. Not until people realize I'm not some freak who thinks he's king shit of turd Island, like they apparantly do. No offence to you, and I'll try to tone it down, after that stupid edit at least. Thanks for trying though.

Reply


... serenskywalker July 15 2006, 07:45:11 UTC
I don't know why the fuck all these things magically lead back to me. But I just thought I'd let you know that I certainly didn't write that message. Sorry, but I don't hide under anonymous. If I have shit to say about you, I would have said it right to your face.

And Chris, they are my friends, not my group. Just like Amber said.

Anyway Stephen, I'm sorry that someone out there has decided to make a fuss over an online journal entry of yours. I honestly didn't do it.

And we should hang out when you get back <3

Love,
Chantal

Reply

Re: ... sarl0ck July 16 2006, 11:21:15 UTC
group Audio pronunciation of "group" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (grp)
n.

1. An assemblage of persons or objects gathered or located together; an aggregation: a group of dinner guests; a group of buildings near the road.

Under that definition, you ARE a group. No, it's not meant as an insult, nor is it meant to cause shit. You have your groups, I have my own.

I don't do things to intentionally cause shit, and you know that I don't.

I will use my own references for your GROUP, because that's exactly what it is.

I could call them your gang. And reference 3x3 Eyes season one as my reasoning. But I don't see any reason to change how I reference things.

I don't consider it, nor deem it to be insulting. It gets the point across, and that's what I'm after.

Reply

Re: ... sarl0ck July 16 2006, 11:22:49 UTC
Posting again because I can't edit: This definition fits better actually.

3. A number of individuals or things considered together because of similarities: a small group of supporters across the country.

Reply


amy_009 July 16 2006, 08:00:04 UTC
There have been anononononamous comments on my journal.
Either C.H. or C.K.
as I would say.
Might be the same person.

HAPPY BELATED BIRTHDAY!
I missers you Steverrrz!!!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up