(Untitled)

Jun 08, 2009 22:14

Why can't we ever have a vigilante thats competent and sane?

I mean, they're not really legal... but if they're going to be there they could at least do more help instead of causing more trouble.

nom nom babies, batman, vigilantes, onoes child snatcher

Leave a comment

Comments 14

picklesplz June 8 2009, 23:01:18 UTC
Competent, I agree, but wouldn't sane get in the way of the whole vigilante thing?

Reply

lamiaunderlaw June 8 2009, 23:05:03 UTC
Well, it would mean he wouldn't be nicking off with people's kids.

Reply

picklesplz June 8 2009, 23:05:52 UTC
...or running about pretending to be a bloodsucking, flying mammal fighting for justice.

Reply

lamiaunderlaw June 8 2009, 23:17:33 UTC
That as well.

Reply


deadpan_snarker June 8 2009, 23:14:54 UTC
If they were sane, they wouldn't be vigilantes.

Reply

lamiaunderlaw June 8 2009, 23:18:52 UTC
If only we could prove it, then I guess the hospital could be chasing them down instead of us.

Reply

deadpan_snarker June 8 2009, 23:25:59 UTC
Well, I think the supposed baby eating might help us with proving it.

Reply

lamiaunderlaw June 8 2009, 23:27:26 UTC
Haha! The butterfly nets would certainly keep him from flying away.

Reply


mrbigandbad June 9 2009, 18:30:39 UTC
They never help more than they hinder. All they do is cause paperwork, and half the time the criminals get to walk once it gets to court. Vigilantes are a pain in the ass.

But the baby-snatching is new.

Reply

lamiaunderlaw June 9 2009, 18:54:49 UTC
If he's anything like the last one, when we do get him he won't be able to lie to cover himself at least.

And more worrying.

Reply

lazyish June 11 2009, 10:20:45 UTC
took the words outta my mouth.

although i don't remember hearing anyone actually report a missing baby that day.

Reply

mrbigandbad June 11 2009, 14:39:06 UTC
No? It could have just been a tabloid claim. Maybe "I gave birth to goatboy" stories were slow.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up