Comments | law_of_reason: 64 [Voice]

law_of_reason

64 [Voice]

Feb 09, 2011 21:14

What good is this event if it's not actually reliable? Or is it symbolic in meaning, as well as literally?

[Yes, yes that's nothing but voice. Not knowing shame is not the same as not having dignity.]

Pointless.

Nothing but a distraction in this case. ...And why are hearts designed like that. Nothing like the real thing. They're not even that ( Read more... )

Comments 127

[Video] buntails February 10 2011, 01:13:39 UTC

[Guess whose hearts are allll over the place?]

Because they represent love!

[Video] law_of_reason February 10 2011, 07:04:45 UTC

[Impassive.]

So?

Re: [Video] buntails February 10 2011, 07:07:26 UTC

So it's symbolic!

Re: [Video] law_of_reason February 10 2011, 07:12:32 UTC

Symbols are overrated.

If something's worth saying, it should be done directly.

Thread 43

agoodfellow February 11 2011, 02:27:05 UTC

The modern symbolic depiction of a heart is closer in actual shape to the human prostate gland.

law_of_reason February 11 2011, 10:49:26 UTC

It does, in a way, now that I think about it. But people have less sentimentality attached to that.

agoodfellow February 14 2011, 01:49:38 UTC

Considerably less.