I found out when someone on facebook posted "The same firm that offers domestic partnership benefits for same-sex partners of its employees, and that has a pretty comprehensive diversity statement is the firm that is defending DoMA in court. Take a look at their website at www.kslaw.com and write Mr. Matchett at smatchett@kslaw.com."
I was reading along going "Ok, yeah, well, that IS how law firms work sometimes... OH HELLO THERE FIRM I'M FAMILIAR WITH."
Yeah, thanks for letting me know - it would have been mildly embarrassing to find out from one of my old co-workers (or worse, bosses) and faceplant in front of them.
The move goes. Looks like I may be down in Durham on Monday, rather than Saturday, as I don't think I can get the movers out of here in time to make it down before 5 (when the rental office closes), and the office is closed on Sunday for Easter. *sigh*
True - I've certainly worked both prosecution and defense in the past. Hell, it's part of the training - if you're on any of the competition teams in law school, you have to argue both sides.
The fact that they took the representation at what I think is a pretty substantial discount (Supreme Court cases are not normally argued at $500k, unless it's a pro bono case on the part of the firm) suggests a certain amount of partisanship, however.
*sigh* Still, everyone is entitled to the best lawyer they can get, and in this case the House got a really, really good one.
Random aside - I'm taking a concealed carry class May 7th. Just in case you're interested. (Not sure if you qualify since you won't have been living here long).
Damn - I'm jealous. *sigh* I guess I'll work my way up to the concealed carry class, although I definitely want to go shooting at some point when I come down. And apply to register and purchase a handgun, definitely.
Comments 10
I was reading along going "Ok, yeah, well, that IS how law firms work sometimes... OH HELLO THERE FIRM I'M FAMILIAR WITH."
Reply
Reply
Reply
How's the move coming?
Reply
Reply
Reply
I think that you certainly made the right choice for you.
Reply
The fact that they took the representation at what I think is a pretty substantial discount (Supreme Court cases are not normally argued at $500k, unless it's a pro bono case on the part of the firm) suggests a certain amount of partisanship, however.
*sigh* Still, everyone is entitled to the best lawyer they can get, and in this case the House got a really, really good one.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment