If reading Ray Monk's biography of Wittgenstein has reinforced one thing with me, it is the importance of written communication between individuals. As a know technophobe who resists most attempts to become "digitized"--this being the notable exception--I have frequently been ridiculed or patronized for my disdain of computers. Recently, for
(
Read more... )
Comments 14
by email. I do not understand the idea that
this is illegitimate, as it seems to me
emails I receive have as much depth and
intimacy and inner truth as letters ever did.
Reply
Reply
to do email I felt that there could
be something lacking, and I have friends
who really never adjusted their correspondence
to it.
But why transitory? I keep letters which seem
to me important and valuable in some way and
probably refer to them more often than I did
the old written ones.
But again it is just my sense, and each
person will differ a little...
+S.
Reply
I did have a lot of mail stored, but then the program died an ugly death, although the bf may have may some back ups at some point.
Reply
While a letter may be difficult to throw away, I have no qualms about periodic purges of e-mails in the name of storage space.
Reply
It's still in testing phase, so you need to be invited to use it, current users sporadically get given invites to offer to their friends. This being livejournal, and gmail being a convient way to deal with lots of notification emails, the gmail_invite community promptly sprang into existence.
Reply
Reply
But I agree. There is something special about holding a letter in your hand. I too have saved all the letters that have been written to me.
Reply
Reply
i just started this sort of letter writing correspondence thing. I've been handwriting thank you notes to quite a few of the professionals that i've met recently. it's cute. i got some nifty cards. but its's still the size of like a postcard.
this all reminds me that i'm not sure i really remember what your address is in SK. can you email it to me? is it a PO box or what?
Reply
I am in staunch disagreement that there is an inherent problem with a medium (insert, say, e-mail here) that can't be constructively addressed through a broad analysis of the medium itself. I believe there is a serious problem with how secondary education in particular raises understanding of different communicative technologies: this is where your friend Postman and most of the "we should be concerned about content-reception!" camp or the "we should be concerned about these passive visuals" camp become useless and counterproductive ( ... )
Reply
I see where your comments are coming from, I'm just not so sure they address my central point: receiving a letter is more interesting than receiving an e-mail. There are certain experiential things that happen in "western letter writing"* that don't happen when you get an e-mail. I like those things and feel that they make correspondence more pleasurable. This pleasure is a certaiin joie de vie, pardon my french, that e-mails just don't give. Personally, I think that you are one of the most electronically savvy people that I know, and also one of the more skilled communicators of your medium (hey, if you can call Postman "my firend, I only think that's fair! *wink*). Yet, I don't think there is anthing special about an e-mail from you beside the fact that it comes with your name attached (in the same blue hyperlink that everyone else's comes in). Letters are different. Each one is unique in many different ways, not just in content. Regardless of how much we educate people about ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment