No more caffeine or sugar for you people! :)
Okay, seriously. Honest questions. All are welcome to comment. All opinions are respected.
Should Rowling grant or not grant interviews? Why or why not?
Should Rowling answer questions vaguely, or in detail? What difference, if any, does it make to you personally?
Do you think Rowling is making things
(
Read more... )
Comments 19
Reply
:)
Reply
We are incredibly blessed not just by the initial gift of the books, but by her recognizing, acknowledging, and responding to our enthusiasm. Who am I to throw any of it back in her face?
Yes, exactly!!!
Reply
Philosophically, I'd have to say she should do it (the first two) if she wants to and can, because dang, how many people can actually do what they want with their lives? That and a lot of people find the facts really interesting, like people like The Silmarillion (um...sp? lol), etc. So more power to her ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Should she give interviews? Yes - as long as she is happy to do it and people enjoy them, as they clearly do, then I wouldn’t wish to spoil the fun. I quite enjoy the interviews myself, and I find the JKR that we see when she’s doing a reading or interacting with young readers quite an attractive personality.
Should she answer vaguely or in detail? I don’t think there’s a general answer to that - it has to depend on the nature of the question and the information that she has. I’m sure she’s asked questions about things that she’s never thought through in detail, so a vague answer or none at all is all that’s possible. It doesn’t affect me personally as long as she isn’t making it up as she goes along, which is pre-empting your next question, or straying too far outside the scope of the books.
Is she making things up? She obviously speaks much more freely now that she doesn’t have to worry about giving things away, but I doubt ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment