Comments | lestatj333: Time To Talk About Whats Important : Me

lestatj333

Time To Talk About Whats Important : Me

Jul 15, 2001 00:57

Here for your amusement is a short list of my likes and dislikes ( Read more... )

Comments 18

fastguy450 July 14 2001, 23:27:26 UTC

Well, My dislike is missing your pressence. Why doin ya get your baby butt over here and drink heavily with us. I miss you sooooo much. enjoy yourself
late

ando7000 July 15 2001, 10:52:59 UTC

this everything...they're are exactly two things in the universe energy and matter...and thats not entirely true either...energy is mearly matter condensed...so i guess (like rev. maynard says) we are just the reflection of the imagination of ourselve...one giant cosmic buzz that doesn't know shit.
-doe

Bill Hick's theory was interesting, but lacking in scientific credibility nitewing64 July 15 2001, 11:36:01 UTC

I've heard the debate of unified theories of existence for years. It's a phylosopher's argument and not a scientist. The belief that energy and matter are one in the same could possibly be true (i'm not going to claim that our current scientific knowledge is absolute), but from current understanding of both, I'd doubt it. Matter is a tangible substance. A tangible substance that plays the bitch to the four unifying energies (gravity, electromagnetic radiation, weak atomic bonds and strong atomic bonds). Now, exactly why there occur, no one's quite positive of, HOWEVER the energy that you speak of is the electromagnetic radiation form. It makes up light, sound, hard radiation, X-rays, heat, ect. It exists on a simple wave form. Matter in movement causes a vibration, these vibrations move from one form of matter to the next, (waves must move from one form of matter to the next, this is why EM waves cannot exist within a vacuum) moving outward, and slowly loosing intensity. The bandwidth of the waves it what differentiates the ( ... )

Re: Bill Hick's theory was interesting, but lacking in scientific credibility ando7000 July 15 2001, 15:01:26 UTC

in electrical theory one learns that energy in the electrical sense is just a difference of potential(voltage), how this voltage is generated(whether by means electromagnetic induction or by reaction[chemical or phyical, both are very similliar]) defines the wave form(sinusodial, square, saw tooth, pulsating dc,etc..). in capcitence theory you see that current is the movement of electrons caused by a mismatchment of electrons in the valenceshells of the materials used.... nuclear theory just confuses it's self... it is to be debated whether energy comes from matter or vice versa...untill one of us figures out the chicken or the egg thing well just have to continue slautering virginsin the name of bill hicks.

Dude nitewing64 July 15 2001, 18:52:45 UTC

I'm down for slaughtering (and raping, mind you)anything and anybody in the name of Bill Hicks.
G

Thread 5

Responding to my own shit nitewing64 July 15 2001, 11:48:49 UTC

The last rant about a more "scientific" approach to the reality of oneness between matter and energy just made me think. Two points actually, and they both revolve around photons. First is the staggering contradiction from the "absolute knowledge" that i've been gaining over the last few years on this matter. It involves light. Light is an electromagnetic wave, as are radio signals for that matter. Light is considered a special one, because why it is an intangable wave, it acts as a tangible substance. This is what photons are. Photons are how we measure light, because light waves actually can break down into these easy-to-view-particles. All right, with that said, first confusion. A simple law that I stated above was that Electro magnetic waves cannot continue in a vaccum do to it's nature of travel (a wave moving outward through vibrating particles, a vacuum having no partilces). Well, if thats true. How do any of us see? The sun allows for an ass-load of photons (and heat for that matter) that travel through the VACUUM ( ... )

All right, i'm seriously done now nitewing64 July 15 2001, 12:46:42 UTC

Just wanted to say, probablly just for me, but the whole theory of electromagnetic wavelenghts not moving through vacuums is bollocks, which bothers me because it was one the few highlighted facts in the first thing I read on the ordeal, but after scouring the internet I've found such things as "Electromagnetic radiation does not require a material medium and can travel through a vacuum." and other credilbe contradictions to my original belief. I apoligize, and now I move on with my life.
G

my PANTS are too TIGHT!! baslug July 15 2001, 17:39:06 UTC

dammit dammit dammit...

i *really* want to jump into this one, but find myself too ignorant to say anything. i just havent learned enough about it yet...i'm sure i'll touch it in physics this next year. otherwise, i've enjoyed the ideas presented from both of you guys...

oh, and jew has a cute ass...
~Ben

Re: my PANTS are too TIGHT!! wickthorn July 16 2001, 05:42:02 UTC

there are monkeys on my undies.

Re: my PANTS are too TIGHT!! fastguy450 July 16 2001, 07:33:19 UTC

You dont need the power....cause you have the monkeys.
Yeah I know, A kids in the hall reference does sound strange coming from me. Probably one of the only ones I know. Im amused anyway
late

I don't have the power 'cause I have the monkies nitewing64 July 16 2001, 10:40:02 UTC

I have the power 'cause I'll let the monkies go. Only a matter of time, I figure.

Thread 7

I can't stand you sexist pigs nitewing64 July 17 2001, 05:10:43 UTC

Listen, here we are, trying to have a civilized and enlightened conversation about the reality of everything, and you "men" (and I'm using this term loosly) have to show off your hormones by referring to my well-toned ass. Now, mind you, I take great pride in my ass's rock hard-like qualities, but that does not excuse your actions.
Grow up, please.
G