Rejecting Doubtful Evidence

[level_head]

The presumption of evidence is being touted as uniquely American or a founding tenet of Western thought. It is important indeed to Western jurisprudence, but its provenance spans thousands of years. Wikipedia notes how the Romans expressed it: “ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat” (“the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on

Comments

[allaboutweather]

Mention Booker and Ellison to a Dem and they'll just give you the "hurrdurr whataboutism" excuse.

They're so self-righteous and act as if they can do no wrong. Even then it's always "false equivalency".

What it really is is a thatsdifferentism and itdoesntcountism..... or just double standards. ;)