MY review of Civilazation 4

Oct 30, 2005 13:50

Here is my "official" review of Civ 4:Civ 3 was a conservative improvement over Civ 2. The reason for the reserved incremental improvement approach they took was that the game Alpha Centauri (which they made after Civ 2) had every Civ feature everybody wanted, but the game sucked. They went conservatively with Civ 3 because they "didn't want to ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 2

Pic physphilo November 2 2005, 16:24:06 UTC
There is no pic here! Get on that.

Also, your review is the perfect combination of artist complaint meets computer scientist complaint, I love it. Nothing like being specific about your graphical complaints. You could have said, "The graphics suck." But, no, you had to talk about polygon culling and algorithms. Oi.

Also, your computer clearly sucks, get a new one. *ahem*

Reply

Re: Pic lexluth0r November 2 2005, 16:38:52 UTC
I thought I removed all references to the screenshot when I discovered that my webserver was hosed, but I guessed I missed one.

This game could have looked SO MUCH BETTER with much better polygon counts to boot if the engineers weren't total shit.

I'm going to call you - it's time for me to do my application.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up