In my pre-sign-up dilemma for
au_bigbang, I had a fairly central thought. What constitutes an AU, in your brain? I'm making a list of all my AUs (if in trouble, make a list!) and I keep coming across something I've added to the list and then thought 'no, you know, that's a story, but it's not a full-blown AU'. Jack/Sam/Daniel getting together during Upgrades
(
Read more... )
Comments 10
Reply
I totally don't see writing an only-shown-as-het character as gay or in a gay relationship as being a fundamental difference; I guess, if in canon it was explicitly stated that a character was straight, had always been straight and would never do another person of their gender ever, then writing them as gay after than would be a fundamental fucking with that canon, but I never really come across canon - personally, I mean - where that's the case, so I ( ... )
Reply
To be an AU, it has to be a drastic change. Like the story where Janet was picked to be on SG-1 and Sam was a lab rat at the SGC = AU. Sam was left behind on Chulak and trained by Bra'tac to be the First Prime of Apophis = AU.
So in my mind, if it's not a rather big shift, it's not an AU. :D
Reply
Reply
Reply
* First Prime
* And the sequel: Primal
Reply
I label stories AU solely in regard to their relationship with canon--not their relationship to other stories, if that makes sense.
Reply
And I want to thank you. Your mention of the AU Big Bang led me back to Summer of Stargate...which is happening again, and which I signed up for! You made my night!
Reply
Ah well, I wanted to get writing more this year... :D
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
I want to play in a Reboot TNG-verse, but I just haven't managed to figure out how it would be all that different. I think a trawl through Memory Alpha is called for to trace out some ramifications. Hmmmm. Ah well there's always the ST big bang later in the year! ;D
Reply
Leave a comment