From Cyber to Print

[lifenxcess]

It has recently come to my attention that my live journal has been reviewed in some cheap gay porn magazine. I have no idea why this may be as my live journal is neither trashy nor gay (okay it's kind of gay), but it's there. I see this as an act of some vindictive fag who wants to antagonize me for god knows what reason (I suspect to get my

Comments

[klingrap]

Oh my god, who do I have to antagonize to get my LJ reviewed in a cheap gay porn mag?!? DISH!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[lifenxcess]

Go talk to mufflerman. He runs the low budget porn mag.

[irishfuck]

entitled?

Re: From the Desk of the Editor-In-Chief of Cybersocket Magazine

[lifenxcess]

And Jeff, I can't really respond to your remarks because I really don't want to further the discussion. But you're right, I was wrong about calling it pornography. Allow me to rephrase: My blog was featured in a cheap cruising magazine. And yes I know it was your right to review my live journal (acknowledged above), but it would have been nice to be asked or informed. I am sensitive about my blog and in some respect feel like it has been exploited and violated. I had the same problem when I found some Jewish blog group interloping and commenting on my life on their own site, almost got into a cyber gang war. This new audience now forces me to watch myself and now I can't use some of my favorite terms like kike or fag (of which I am obviously partial being a neo-nazi fag basher and a Jewish sometimes lesbian to boot. So contradictory, will this girl ever stop?). Maybe if I'm fortunate enough I could put enough slurs in this blog to get a whole cyber campaign going against me.

p.s. Jeff, you’re a talent kid. Get a real job!

No matter what.....

[blamopowbifouch]

No matter what they do, they can never take your "fag" or "kike" away from you. You've earned them...

Pure Genius

[anonymous]

I love people who don’t contradict themselves: “It has recently come to my attention that my live journal has been reviewed in some cheap gay porn magazine.” Then you say: “Though I am making no decisions until I actually see the review.” - Pure genius. I’m really glad you thought this one through.

Re: Pure Genius

[irishfuck]

um, first of all you could mask your sarcasm a lil bit better because as is, whoever you are, you sound like an arrogant dick.

secondly, i think you should really think your responses through, as you claim there exists a contradiction in her post when there is in fact none.

Re: Pure Genius

[dingywhite]

listen to the yawning cat.

Re: Pure Genius

[lifenxcess]

I love the puppy and the cat ::kisses::

*

[mufflerman]

Here's the thing

Re: *

[irishfuck]

Dearest Sundial,

you're funny.

don't give in to apathy. feel. love. dance around the sacred flame with posies in your hair.

becki is sensitive about her thoughts and feelings, both of which are found here, in her journal. i honestly would react in the same skeptical way if someone whom i had a 'past' with (admitted also by you), decided to review my intimate thoughts in an online magazine. I believe that you had the best intentions, but that they were misconstrued.

SUNDIAL!

[anonymous]

I would think as an editor your grammar use would be a little bit better.

[lifenxcess]

You would think that, wouldn't you? Damn scandal that I'm determining what you read! Long live the Da Vinci Code!

[mufflerman]

So, are you still blogging? I miss hearing about the mishaps of Becki Heller.