Reading
these two books concurrently has me thinking about place making. Specifically, why should it cost a lot to make small commercial/residential streets friendly for pedestrians and bikes? A lot of the planning initiatives I've seen assume that rigid zoning + money = good places. I think that's dead wrong. I think flexible zoning + time = good
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
Also, I think pride in ones home is absolutely essential. One of the reason I love Davis so much is that Davisites are fiercely territorial- yeah, this is a weird little cow-cum-college town, but damnit, this is their weird little cow-cum-college town, and don't you forget it! As a result, there are lots of community-oriented things, from farmers markets to a bike-powered carousel in Central Park.
Taking that into account, it would seem to me that it's a matter of flexible zone + time + community investment (both in the sense of the community investing in the town and the town investing in the community) = good places.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment