So
this is yet another sobering look at feminism on the front lines (though I think it's rather innacurate to call it the 'new' feminism - women have been losing their lives in the battle for equality for a long, long time). The thing that really stuck with me though, and I blame hanging out with Team Ranga and the Tee-Esses yesterday, was the
(
Read more... )
Comments 14
Reply
Reply
Reply
It's something that really pisses me off about anti-choicers (and Im not going to call them pro-lifers, because they're not): Childbirth is risky; in some instances, it's deadly. Telling women they *have* to carry to term is telling them they have to risk their own safety and life for that of the fetus they carry.
Reply
The fact that it is ignored because 'dying in childbirth' is somehow 'normal' is abhorrent. It devalues the importance of women as human beings. The current belief, essentially, is that they should just accept it as their lot, because they have no choice but to be the ones who carry the child. It's almost as if the mentality is, "Oh, whoops, this one's broken. Couldn't produce a child without dying. Better get a new one! There's plenty of 'em."
And forgive me if that makes no sense. I'm writing through a cold. *sniff*
Reply
The current belief, essentially, is that they should just accept it as their lot, because they have no choice but to be the ones who carry the child
This. How many men run the risk of dying due to conception? The cynic in me thinks... actually, *knows*... that if men ran the same risks that women did when pregnancy occured that this would be dealt with pretty damn quickly.
You know what a lifesaving kit looks like?
( ... )
Reply
Reply
Kits can be assembled in multiples of 600 or 1000 at a cost of $160 per 200 kits, e.g. 600 kits is $480, 1000 is $800, 1200 is $960, 2000 is $1600 etc.
making 200 kits would cost 10 people $16 each. That's pretty darn doable!
Reply
Leave a comment