well just a pet peave of mine,, is as with thise group that does not constitute pansexuality... which so many are claiming to be.. and i don't mean this to be offensive.. but more of a statement for this group.. if you read.. pansexual by its true definition.. most would not be able to say they are due to inhibitions.... and taboo's which if they
(
Read more... )
Comments 3
i also think nobody can define sexuality for someone else... if someone says they are pansexcual who is anyone else to say that they interpreted its definition wrong?
i don't know exactly what you're referring to so maybe i'm off with how i interpret what you're saying. if that's the case, sorry.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment