Leave a comment

Comments 44

paulnolan September 24 2010, 07:42:30 UTC
I like this answer <3

Reply

lisaquestions September 24 2010, 13:11:13 UTC
Man, I'm just glad I haven't had any trolls so far.

Now watch what happens while I'm asleep.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

fruhlings September 24 2010, 13:07:07 UTC
Oh God, Tumblr. I have such a love-hate relationship with that site. There's a lot of -ist bullshit that I cannot stand, but at the same time, I get to be nerdy wrt my fandoms and learn about some political/anti-oppression stuff. There are some good anti-oppression/educational blogs out there, but there's just as much crap, too. Bleh.

Reply

lisaquestions September 24 2010, 13:08:21 UTC
So really, it's a lot like livejournal crossed with a game of telephone.

Reply

fruhlings September 24 2010, 13:13:27 UTC
Basically, lolol. That's the perfect way to describe it. It can get very gossipy very quickly, sort of like sf_d and ontd. ALSO HIPSTERS NEED TO STOP POSTING GROSS AND BLOODY PHOTOS. Do not want at 9 o'clock in the morning.

But like I said, I've learned stuff from it. The Genderqueer tumblr is great, and there are some good political commentator-types on there.

And I like your tumblr as well, because you reblog/post good stuff. :)

Reply


fruhlings September 24 2010, 13:08:32 UTC
But people need to express their opinions~! FREE SPEECH! DON'T OPPRESS MY RIGHT TO BE OBNOXIOUSLY OFFENSIVE!

Ugh.

Reply

lisaquestions September 24 2010, 13:10:51 UTC
But but I don't care if people express their opinions, I just don't want LJ to feature them!

Reply

fruhlings September 24 2010, 13:13:53 UTC
I KNOW RIGHT? LJ is so creepy sometimes. :|

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

lisaquestions September 24 2010, 18:49:54 UTC
Probably. I saw people advocate eugenics which set me off.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

lisaquestions September 24 2010, 20:13:13 UTC
Yep. People say shit like it would never ever be applied to them.

Reply


anonymous November 21 2010, 15:50:18 UTC
I don't get it. Why is this question mysogynist? I can see why any particular answer would be, but the question itself is worded pretty neutral, IMO.

(even though the whole point that it's even in question is terrible.)

Reply

lisaquestions November 21 2010, 15:52:38 UTC
Because controlling whether some people are allowed to have children primarily affects women. Many many many women were sterilized against their will on the basis of this kind of question - women of color and women with disabilities especially. In practical, historical terms, men were much less likely to be sterilized "for their own good."

Reply

wombathouse February 15 2011, 22:59:19 UTC
I am just randomly (and months later) here because I liked your post on dot_gimp_snark & lurked over here to your journal ( ... )

Reply

lisaquestions February 15 2011, 23:04:55 UTC
I think that if a conversation like this must happen at all that it must be a conversation. Questions on "writer's block" are not a conversation, and we just get to see people parade their worst bullshit.

Right now I'm unconvinced that the primary problem facing humanity is overpopulation. It's more a matter of who gets the resources and who works to supply many of those resources. The situation is currently untenable because it's built on the concept of economic exploitation of less powerful nations and marginalized people.

The other thing is that I am pretty much entirely opposed to eugenics, which I think this kind of large scale handling of procreation seems almost guaranteed to jump into at a breakneck pace.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up