I'll keep doing my best to figure out my own context, so don't be surprised if that results in future contact. I'm not thrilled about it, but you said it yourself. It's significant. It has to be if it's included
But I think we've gone about as far as we can in this vein for now.
Are you trying to use my own logic against me? Our minds could work differently, you know.
I will tolerate future contact, but I request you keep it to the journals, unless the topic if of the utmost sensitivity. I'm very busy and have better things to do with my time than entertain your notions that we somehow knew each other.
'Against you' implies something hostile. I'm trying to figure this out using the same logic you presented. Though, true, no two minds work the same way.
Hey, works for me. I'm not exactly itching to have-a-face to face since those haven't exactly gone swimmingly so far. Just clearing the way for dialogue in the event that something important does pop up.
Housekeeping will take care of the stains. Be more careful next time.
-Aurora
Reply
-Aurora
Reply
Reply
-Aurora
Reply
So you'd say that none of the information you've received from the dreams was random or arbitrary, but significant?
Reply
-Aurora
Reply
I'll keep doing my best to figure out my own context, so don't be surprised if that results in future contact. I'm not thrilled about it, but you said it yourself. It's significant. It has to be if it's included
But I think we've gone about as far as we can in this vein for now.
Reply
I will tolerate future contact, but I request you keep it to the journals, unless the topic if of the utmost sensitivity. I'm very busy and have better things to do with my time than entertain your notions that we somehow knew each other.
-Aurora
Reply
Hey, works for me. I'm not exactly itching to have-a-face to face since those haven't exactly gone swimmingly so far. Just clearing the way for dialogue in the event that something important does pop up.
Reply
Leave a comment