(Untitled)

Feb 14, 2007 00:38

Here is an article that appeared in the Vindicator today ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 3

penultimatepowr February 14 2007, 14:10:03 UTC
My mom mentioned something about that the other day, but I wouldn't get my hopes up for that 17 and under rule. I'd imagine that most of those kids are there unsupervised because their parents don't want to deal with them..... but in any case the rule would drop attendance of that age group... You should gather information that shows that such a rule would increase the attendance of other age groups and send it to corporate or whatever the proper channels are... aaaaaanyway..... Sorry to hear about your plight Jenna.

Reply


blackdragoness February 15 2007, 04:02:37 UTC
::hugs:: i'm sorry. :-/

Reply


rationaldreamer March 17 2007, 03:19:08 UTC
17 and under need to be escorted at the movie theater because people got in a brawl? Adults brawl all the time but they don't need escorts. If they had that law (that you must be accompanied by an adult if you are under 17 after 6pm) do you know how much of my pre-teen and teenage life I would have missed? That's ALL we used to do was go to the theater, and we never got into fights or really did much of anything except giggle (like most teenagers).
I hope you realize by my comment that I find such a proposal inordinate by the highest measure! Ridiculous for the state to be able to infringe on peoples' rights simply because the silent majority is frightened.

HARUMPH!

-jc
(the real one)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up