Dont't create art, and then mock it

Apr 25, 2005 17:30

Andrew says ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 27

vanityangel89 April 25 2005, 20:35:44 UTC
Amen.

Reply


ceqarht April 25 2005, 20:54:01 UTC
Leviticus also says a bunch of really wack stuff. If I'm not mistaken you CAN'T eat shellfish (So anybody who eats shrimp is going to hell) and CAN'T associate with a womyn who is on her period...pretty stupid stuff.

The sections with Sodom are also pretty vague in their references to homosexuality and don't provide an exclusive reason for believing that homosexuality is the reason the city was destroyed (the text mentions that there were rapists, thieves, etc. in the city as well).

Even the linguistic analysis of the words that supposedly relate to homosexuality are pretty vague and if you follow explicit translation from the original Greek version they don't make any sense for the homosexuality thing...

So yeah...the bible doesn't mention it. Period.

Reply


anonymous April 26 2005, 06:18:10 UTC
God made ADAM AND EVE! not ADAM AND STEVE!

Reply

liveguyep April 26 2005, 14:39:03 UTC
actually god made everyone, so he really made adam, eve, and steve

Reply


**Audible Sigh** jeebuz April 26 2005, 09:49:52 UTC
Okay.... to explain:

a.) Joe Scarborough was not defending homosexuality. He's an ultraconservative that believes gays shouldn't get married.

b.) Bill Maher said that descrimination against homosexuals stems from religion, i.e. The Bible. Scarborough then said that there is nothing in the bible that condemns homosexuality. I was mearly pointing out the retardedness of yet another conservative.

c.) I don't need to be lectured on the relivance of the 316 laws in the old testament. The no-homo's law being one of them. Others being that a woman is unclean for 7 days during her menstral cycle, as is anyone or anything she touches. Men are also "unclean until evening" when he has "an emission of seed."

As I said, I'm a homo that went to catholic school for 13 years... I wasn't saying that homosexuality was wrong, mearly that Joe Scarborough's comment was wrong. I probably should have provided some context prior to the quote.

Reply

Re: **Audible Sigh** itchyorion April 26 2005, 10:20:04 UTC
i got what you were trying to say in the first place ;)

Reply

Re: **Audible Sigh** liveguyep April 26 2005, 14:40:38 UTC
well next time you should explain yourself better so that you don't look like such a fuckin hipocrit

Reply


itchyorion April 26 2005, 10:18:16 UTC
I have to agree with ya Matt...It gets on my last nerve when people take the Bible word for word. Like you said, whatever the case it was written by man...not God. Secondly, it's been through many translations, all of which can come to mean different things as there is no perfect translation between two languages...and lastly, it's so not in context with today's society and culture (as you said). I think the Bible is great, has a lot of good stuff in there, but when you take it word for word and pick and chose what parts you want to be significant that's just not fair...i mean for the longest time they justified slavery by quoting the Bible...c'mon now...

Reply

jeebuz April 26 2005, 11:05:39 UTC
oh jesus fucking christ.... anyone that knows me knows that I put as much belief into the bible as I put into a Dr. Suess book. I've always said it should be shelved in Fiction, and if alphabetical by author then it should be under "S" for "Sexist Pigs."

Reply

itchyorion April 26 2005, 11:32:37 UTC
i know you!!! i didn't mean you andrew...sorry if it came off that way...

Reply

liveguyep April 26 2005, 14:42:31 UTC
EXACTLY... History repeats itself yet again

Reply


Leave a comment

Up