JC

Jul 12, 2016 21:44

Just wondering if we have any Corbynistas in the house and whether they could possibly explain why it's so worth celebrating a presumed repeat of his leadership triumph. We all know it makes Labour unelectable, so what's the point?

Leave a comment

Comments 13

Your reply re Corbyn. doug57a July 12 2016, 23:10:50 UTC
I'll be voting Ukip in future. Had enough of Labour and The Tories.

Reply

Re: Your reply re Corbyn. doug57a July 12 2016, 23:13:30 UTC
As above. I'll be voting for Ukip next election.

Reply

Re: Your reply re Corbyn. a_pawson July 13 2016, 11:12:15 UTC
Will UKIP even exist by then? They are a single issue party, which has achieved it's raison d'etre. What would they stand for?

Reply

Re: Your reply re Corbyn. doug57a July 13 2016, 18:19:30 UTC
Oh. A bit of French their isn't it (Raison d'etre)?? Lets wait and see. Doubt if we will see The Liberals again. Labour is in a state. What is Corbyn doing (The Hokey Cokey? In, out, in, out shake it all about??). Sam n Dave have legged it as fast as they can leaving May in charge now SO, as I've said, lets just wait and see what happens next. Hopefully she'll get on with Brexit first then deal with the rest a bit later.

Reply


bogwitch July 13 2016, 07:26:42 UTC
I like Corbyn, but I agree that however good/bad he is, Labour need an electable leader. Now.

Reply


a_pawson July 13 2016, 08:38:18 UTC
Does he make Labour unelectable? This keeps on being repeated, yet in every by-election and local election that has been held since he became Leader, the Labour share of the vote has increased. The party membership has almost doubled, and he has engaged a lot of people who felt they were previously not represented by any political party.

The point is that an awful lot of Labour supporters think he represents the policies they believe in. His leadership raises a serious question - should a party have policies based on the principles its leader and membership believe in, or should it have whatever policies it thinks are most likely to get hem elected. I prefer the former.

Reply

biascut July 14 2016, 09:00:56 UTC
The coherent argument for why he's unelectable is that under FPTP, all of those newly-engaged people and increased vote share doesn't matter, because those are all mostly safe Labour constituencies anyway. The people that Corbyn is engaging aren't the right people in the right places to win seats off the Conservatives or the SNP, which is what Labour needs to form a government. Which is why British (particularly English) politics always defaults to the centre ground.

If Westminster was elected by PR, then increased turnout, greater engagement and polls showing support for Corbyn would be indicative. But under FPTP, the only thing that really matters is Labour's showing in the marginal seats that swing an election, and I've not seen any analysis at that level that suggests that Corbyn could win an election. If it's out there, I'd love to see it!

Reply

turk_diddler July 14 2016, 16:11:51 UTC
That's a very cogent response, and raises the precise points that no Corbyn supporter seems able to comprehend or respond to. Under the current system his and their intransigence prevent Labour from having the support required to moderate the movement to right that parliament takes under a Tory government.

But then socialists and Trotskyists aren't particularly well known for their pragmatism, and at £3-a-vote that can afford to fantasise. Here's hoping £25 sees a few of them off.

Reply


biascut July 13 2016, 09:08:37 UTC
Meh at "Corbynista". Turning support for any particular candidate or leader into an unchanging identity is not doing the Labour party any favours.

Reply


alexandrerer November 21 2016, 13:00:58 UTC
Dear Readers ! I invite you to spend your holidays in the resorts of the Crimea! Many attractions, hotels, beaches, adventure tourism, diving!
All of the information that you will need you can find on the website allkrim.com! Come to us and trust me you will not regret it!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up