Here we go again...

May 23, 2005 08:45

Please, if you don't trust either me or the communication line you're on, temporarily change your password to use the meme. Otherwise, look back to the last post and use my non-password version. I've kept the features as close as possible, except for the friends-only and 25-post constraints. I hope that OpenID or some other method (see lj_dev) will ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 58

pthalogreen May 24 2005, 23:58:11 UTC
why do you need a password for that? can't you look at the calendar view and tally?

Reply

kunzite1 May 24 2005, 23:59:45 UTC
or just wait for openid to be stupidly easy to use?

Reply

supersat May 25 2005, 00:03:12 UTC
OpenID alone won't help, as it only identifies you to a site you visit, but doesn't give that site any permission to use that account. However, there are plans to extend it so that you can give sites certain permissions to use your account (like, posting a picture to your journal from flickr, or counting your entries, etc.).

Reply

kunzite1 May 25 2005, 00:03:56 UTC
true, true. my fault. forgot that little tidbit. :)

Reply


missysedai May 25 2005, 00:08:56 UTC
Oooh, neato!

Reply


trshtwns01 May 25 2005, 00:12:57 UTC
Surely I'm not the only person who sees something incredibly wrong with any 'nifty' script that requires you to enter your password?

Reply


ydna May 25 2005, 00:13:11 UTC
Dude, can you make a version that works sans my password; using only publicly available information? Thanks.

Reply

ladycalliope May 25 2005, 00:48:44 UTC
Wasn't that the original version of his meme? I ran this one last week or so: http://www.livejournal.com/users/g0thm0g/105577.html

Reply

g0thm0g May 25 2005, 00:52:35 UTC
Gladly would I do so if you were to show me how to fetch more than the last 25 posts from RSS. That's what I first until this version was requested...

Reply


jeffreyatw May 25 2005, 00:15:07 UTC
What the hell? I don't care how securely you might keep our info; making a meme that asks for a password is retarded, and probably against the LJ terms of service, too.

Reply

anonymous May 26 2005, 02:30:34 UTC
Fuckdummy.

Reply

jeffreyatw May 26 2005, 07:25:40 UTC
Why hello good sir

Reply


Leave a comment

Up