Wasn't there an attempt some time ago to skew this thing one day by someone starting a push for many people to post using the mood "quixotic"? Maybe that was a simliar yet different toy.
Now, a statistician would ask whether or not this sampling pool is diverse enough.
Do LJ-ers represent an accurate cross section of society? Clearly, there will be a bias towards a little wealthier, because internet access is a prereq. but, in terms of personalities, maybe LJ-ers are naturally more melancholy than the typical population? after all, we're a reflective bunch, certainly moreso than the typical MySpace user.
Also, it seems like you should be normalizing on how often people are posting at all. A lot of the graphs seem similar, and my guess is that's just the fluctuations of when people post.
Comments 25
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Yep it was.
Reply
Do LJ-ers represent an accurate cross section of society? Clearly, there will be a bias towards a little wealthier, because internet access is a prereq. but, in terms of personalities, maybe LJ-ers are naturally more melancholy than the typical population? after all, we're a reflective bunch, certainly moreso than the typical MySpace user.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment