review for wonder_babe
SCORING CARD
User Info (8 points) 2 points each
1. Can you contact the user easily? Do they have email? Messenger services? A website? yes (2 points)
2. Are interests listed? a bunch of very unique ones (2 points)
3. Do they have user pictures? Enough, too few?
Max amount. max amount (2 points
4. Do the pictures reflect the user, are creative, original? Do they keep with the style of the journal? yup (2 points)
User Info __8__ of 8 points
8- Excellent
5-7 Good
2-4 fair
0-1 Poor
total for this category -8- points
User Info comments/suggestions:
well she really talks in detail about herself..just from looking at her profile...i got an idea of who she was ;)
Biography (4 Points)
Does the biography tell about the user? Is it descriptive, creative, well thought out? Are images included within the biography OR Is it customized in any special way that makes it stand out (customized fonts, color, links)? Does the biography provoke interest to read the journal?
The links are a little much but I still think it is great, you really explain some things about you and your interest. Very nice.
Total points for this category -3- out of -4-
Biography 3 of 4 Points
4- Excellent
3- Good
2 Fair
1 Poor
0 This user does not have a Biography
Biography comments/suggestions:
Same as the user info.d
Journal (30 points) 6 points each
1. Do they post frequently? Are there large gaps between posts? If so do they give explanations why?
Very frequent posts, at least one a day. No noicible gaps between post. Well down!
6/6
2. Is the journal overall grammatically correct? Is the spelling, capitalization, punctuation good? Is it easy to read?
AMAZING, is all I could say. I did'nt see one error in the spelling or grammer OR capitalization.
6/6
3. Depth of posts: Do the posts have much substance to them? Do their posts consist of a good length or are they brief? Do the posts make you want to continue reading the journal?
Her posts have alot of substance to them, but there is something missing. I really don't know what it is but I know there is. Otherwise then that, very well down and kept me reading on and on.
5/6
4. Do posts flow well or is it difficult to follow their train of thought in journal entries?
Her posts flow very well. She usually is talking about what she is going to do next and alot about her self and her life problems. Very intriging.
6/6
5. Do the posts have overall variety? Do they stay on one subject or write about various things/events? Do they post pictures, links, quizzes or polls, if they do are they hidden by the lj-cut tags? Does that make up a major part of the journal or is there a balance between those things and written entries? Quizzes links and polls should be kept to a minimum and the lj cut tags should be used to cover them?
Very good balance of everything, that is all I have to say.
6/6
Journal 29 of 30 points
30 Excellent journal. Highly recommended!
22-29 Good journal. Great read. Recommended.
15-21 Fair journal. Good read, could use some changes.
8-14 Below average journal. Needs improvements.
0-7 Poor journal. Immediate improvements highly recommended.
Journal comments/suggestions: none
Total of 29/30
Style (8 points)
Is the journal customized with a color scheme other then the standard lj settings? Are links customized? Is the design of the journal appealing? Does it go together? Is the journal friends only or public? Are comments enabled? If so can anyone post comments?
Everything perfect
8/8
Style 8 of 8 points
8- Excellent design/customization.
5-7 Good style.
2-4 Average style. Could use some minor customization.
0-2 Fair to poor style. Changes recommended.
Style comments/suggestions:
Total 47 (of 50 points)
50- Perfect!
45-49 - A - Great Journal! Highly recommended!
40-44 - B - Good journal. Recommended.
35-39 - C - Average journal.
30-34 - D - Below average journal. Needs mild improvement.
0- 30 - F - Poor journal. Improvements highly recommended.
(OPTIONAL)
LiveJournal Activity Status 4/5 stars (*1 star each)
1. Are they a member of any communities? Yes
2. Do they post comments to other journals? Yes
3. Do they post close to or equivalent of the amount of comments they receive? Yes
4. Are they a paid user or show support of lj in other ways (help out in LJ support)? Not that I know of
5. Do they have friends listed? Yup
total:
***** Highly active and supportive member of Livejournal
**** Active and supportive member of Livejournal
*** Moderately active proud member of Livejournal
** Somewhat active member of Livejournal
* Main focus on their journal. Small participation within Livejournal.
0 Does not take advantage of the features Livejournal has to offer
User Info (8 points) 2 points each
1. Can you contact the user easily? Do they have email? Messenger services? A website? yes (2 points)
2. Are interests listed? a bunch of very unique ones (2 points)
3. Do they have user pictures? Enough, too few?
Max amount. max amount (2 points
4. Do the pictures reflect the user, are creative, original? Do they keep with the style of the journal? yup (2 points)
User Info __8__ of 8 points
8- Excellent
5-7 Good
2-4 fair
0-1 Poor
total for this category -8- points
User Info comments/suggestions:
well she really talks in detail about herself..just from looking at her profile...i got an idea of who she was ;)
Biography (4 Points)
Does the biography tell about the user? Is it descriptive, creative, well thought out? Are images included within the biography OR Is it customized in any special way that makes it stand out (customized fonts, color, links)? Does the biography provoke interest to read the journal?
The links are a little much but I still think it is great, you really explain some things about you and your interest. Very nice.
Total points for this category -3- out of -4-
Biography 3 of 4 Points
4- Excellent
3- Good
2 Fair
1 Poor
0 This user does not have a Biography
Biography comments/suggestions:
Same as the user info.d
Journal (30 points) 6 points each
1. Do they post frequently? Are there large gaps between posts? If so do they give explanations why?
Very frequent posts, at least one a day. No noicible gaps between post. Well down!
6/6
2. Is the journal overall grammatically correct? Is the spelling, capitalization, punctuation good? Is it easy to read?
AMAZING, is all I could say. I did'nt see one error in the spelling or grammer OR capitalization.
6/6
3. Depth of posts: Do the posts have much substance to them? Do their posts consist of a good length or are they brief? Do the posts make you want to continue reading the journal?
Her posts have alot of substance to them, but there is something missing. I really don't know what it is but I know there is. Otherwise then that, very well down and kept me reading on and on.
5/6
4. Do posts flow well or is it difficult to follow their train of thought in journal entries?
Her posts flow very well. She usually is talking about what she is going to do next and alot about her self and her life problems. Very intriging.
6/6
5. Do the posts have overall variety? Do they stay on one subject or write about various things/events? Do they post pictures, links, quizzes or polls, if they do are they hidden by the lj-cut tags? Does that make up a major part of the journal or is there a balance between those things and written entries? Quizzes links and polls should be kept to a minimum and the lj cut tags should be used to cover them?
Very good balance of everything, that is all I have to say.
6/6
Journal 29 of 30 points
30 Excellent journal. Highly recommended!
22-29 Good journal. Great read. Recommended.
15-21 Fair journal. Good read, could use some changes.
8-14 Below average journal. Needs improvements.
0-7 Poor journal. Immediate improvements highly recommended.
Journal comments/suggestions: none
Total of 29/30
Style (8 points)
Is the journal customized with a color scheme other then the standard lj settings? Are links customized? Is the design of the journal appealing? Does it go together? Is the journal friends only or public? Are comments enabled? If so can anyone post comments?
Everything perfect
8/8
Style 8 of 8 points
8- Excellent design/customization.
5-7 Good style.
2-4 Average style. Could use some minor customization.
0-2 Fair to poor style. Changes recommended.
Style comments/suggestions:
Total 47 (of 50 points)
50- Perfect!
45-49 - A - Great Journal! Highly recommended!
40-44 - B - Good journal. Recommended.
35-39 - C - Average journal.
30-34 - D - Below average journal. Needs mild improvement.
0- 30 - F - Poor journal. Improvements highly recommended.
(OPTIONAL)
LiveJournal Activity Status 4/5 stars (*1 star each)
1. Are they a member of any communities? Yes
2. Do they post comments to other journals? Yes
3. Do they post close to or equivalent of the amount of comments they receive? Yes
4. Are they a paid user or show support of lj in other ways (help out in LJ support)? Not that I know of
5. Do they have friends listed? Yup
total:
***** Highly active and supportive member of Livejournal
**** Active and supportive member of Livejournal
*** Moderately active proud member of Livejournal
** Somewhat active member of Livejournal
* Main focus on their journal. Small participation within Livejournal.
0 Does not take advantage of the features Livejournal has to offer