Cloud no. 9
1) All fills for prompts of the earlier prompt posts go in the post the prompt was posted in. No re-posting or splitting up prompts and fills.
2) Self-prompt when you post unprompted fic. (This means posting what the fill is about in a first comment, like a real prompt, and commenting on that with your fill.)
3) Try not to get too srs business. ( Read more... )
A first, forum!verse work-in-progress because I can't post or write all of these in one go.
Reply
What follows is a brief over-look of MarxismRulz.co.uk along with some historical factoids. The number of moderators is decided based on the number of traffic the sub-forum gets - the high-traffic ones may have all moderators as their moderators, while others may only have two of them. A forum leader doesn't have to be a moderator - it simply means they look after the forum, create discussions if needed and alert the moderators of any problems that may arise.
Format:
Forum name - Forum description as on the main page
Any additional information below.
The Man, The Writings, The Beard - About Karl Marx himself. Please don't discuss the beard too much. It gets tiring ( ... )
Reply
History: Begun by TonyPwns as part of his forum-wide reform procedures. Besides Admin Q's, this became the new home for Tony's videoblogs and camwhoring threads, a tradition nipped in the bud by the next administrator, RedPaper.
Forum leader: none
Moderators: Hurpdurp, feminisms
Off-Topic - Anything goes. Well, almost anything..
History: Home to such popular time-waste threads as "Are you wearing anything red at the moment?" and "Three objects in my vicinity I bought under the tyranny of the capitalist society". Also the target of the occasional troll attack.
Forum leader: none
Moderators: all
Jack's Pensive Corner - Jack's always got something on his mind!
History: Established by RedPaper to put Jack's skills in tl;dr into good use. Only Jack may post in this forum, but others may comment. They rarely do.
Forum leader: superfragilisticexpialidocious
Moderators: none
Moderators' Hang-out History: Begun by Smithy as a way to communicate with his ( ... )
Reply
this became the new home for Tony's videoblogs and camwhoring threads, a tradition nipped in the bud by the next administrator, RedPaper. hee!
I love this. So much, I can't decide If I'd marry this lovely, lighthearted, oddly accurate verse, you yourself , or your awesome writing style first!
Just...this is fast becoming one of the all-time greats of this meme, and I'd just like to thank you for introducing it to all out lives...thank you so much :)))
Reply
1977 (David) [Moderator]
Would you, though?
feminisms (Harriet) [Moderator]
I would.
Comrade by the Big Ben (Sally)
Hmm. Yes. #braggingrights :)
Machiavellirox (Jonathan)
Ugh.
SKINNAD (DENNIS)
I DONT UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION
WOULD I WHAT
Scoop (Yvette) [Moderator]
You never answered the question yourself, David.
1977 (David) [Moderator]
I obviously wouldn't. Unless I was drunk.
Really, really drunk.
Hurpdurp (Ed) [Admin]
WTF, David. He's like an uncle we grew up with. How can you even consider such a thing?
SKINNAD (DENNIS)
WOULD I WHAT
WHAT
WHAT
ANSWER ME
Postie (Alan)
I would not, unless he asked nicely. :)
Shitweek (Dianne) [Moderator]
Dennis, you know the saying 'ignorance is bliss'?
SKINNAD (DENNIS)
I KNOW ALL THE SAYINGS
ALL OF THEM
Everton (Andy) [Moderator]
I'm with Ed, why would you even ask, David, and why would you even consider it and most of all, what is with the ladies saying yes?
Dennis - this is one of those things you are better off not knowing about.
Comrade by the Big Ben ( ( ... )
Reply
Even the ones Gordon talked him into, Charlie? Haha! I cannot get enough of this verse, I may never get enough of it, it is pure and distilled win :)
(And I rather think I would, actually. I liked the beard...**ponders**)
Would you, authoranon?
Reply
<3 Authoranon, you're still brilliant.
Would you?
I defy anyone to tell me they wouldn't. I would in a heartbeat!
Reply
Awesome fic, anon!
Reply
I DONT KNOW WHAT TO THINK
THIS IS A FIRST
I fucking love you for bringing SKINNAD into my life.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
PointsOfAwesome (John)
I was looking up some books about parliament for Sally and I found this Grauniad article about an m/m romance novel which came out some months back. It features two fictitious Labour MP's and, well, let me quote from the article:
'New Boys' is a debut novel by P.D. Almond and tells the tale of two new Members of Parliament, who get stuck working in the same cramped office as they begin their political careers. Tensions fly high at first, but the two find a common tune eventually, working together with the leadership of the Labour party to defeat the Conservative party in the next election and rise out of opposition. As the corruption of the present government begins to unravel, so do their feelings for one another ( ... )
Reply
The reviews for this book on Amazon are really good, even better than for the book David wrote on Anthony Crosland.
1977 (David) [Moderator]
That one hasn't come out yet! >:(
Hurpdurp (Ed) [Admin]
My bad. Still working on those steamy scenes, huh?
1977 (David) [Moderator]
I'm releasing it for free anyway. It's what Anthony would have wanted.
Hurpdurp (Ed) [Admin]
Translation: nobody would publish it.
I just read the excerpt from the Labour MP book on Amazon. I, er, am not going to buy this, I don't think. It's quite interesting in terms of the politics but must they shag so often?
Scoop (Yvette) [Moderator]
I think with books such as this there is a "every sixth page minimum" rule.
NOTGIDEON99 (George)
Conservatives don't have this sort of trash literature written about our fictitious MP's!
feminisms (Harriet) [Moderator]
Because you can't even win a fictitious election.
Everton (Andy) [Moderator]
That, or the fact most Conservative erotica is categorised under "Horror".
NOTGIDEON99 (George ( ... )
Reply
(Also: MOAR!)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment