(Untitled)

Jan 02, 2007 04:36

I haven't posted here in a while but I will now. It is in response to this ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 3

firstbase11897 January 3 2007, 04:04:31 UTC
I didn't read this whole thing yet, but I caught the bottom.

It it definitely possible for someone to age that much. Other than the hair, there isn't much of a difference. Someone can look much older simply because of the way a picture is taken. With the proper tools, someone can look years older or younger than they actually are.

Gray hair means nothing. My uncle went from no gray to about 90% in just a couple of years.

Reply

lonesaber January 3 2007, 22:15:02 UTC
Look at the way the face is shaped. One is completely different from the other. And no, it is not doctored. These are the standard Presidential portraits. I gathered them, not some person making the same point. It is also important to note that I have no clue how to use photoshop (if I had it.)

What advantage would looking older have?

Reply


atalantiel January 4 2007, 00:19:14 UTC
I did read all of it, and while I don't necessarily agree 100% (in fact, much of it I just don't have enough knowledge of to make a decision in any direction) I must respect the way you conduct an argument.

I think it's interesting that within the latest elections there have been very many people who are normally affiliated with one party voting for the other.

If there's anything that I do firmly believe in, it's supporting our military. They know what they're getting themselves into and I respect them.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up