not an Old 97s reference....
so my eye still hurts like homeade sin (which is a lot worse than store bought sin, i tell you what)...i guess if i had to describe my eye pain i'd have to say it feels like someone took a sandspur and jabbed it under my eyelid, stamped down on it really hard, then flushed it out with alcohol...that's what it feels like....a lesser man would not be
( Read more... )
Comments 4
i hate people that review books before they've actually completed them.
if thats what is going on here, then i'm leaving!
the lack of an old 97s reference IS an old 97s reference. sorta like "when the phone doesn't ring, it's me"
Reply
"the da vinci code wasn't bad, but this one is not so good so far...maybe it'll get better..."
i made no claim about the totality of the book, only that so far it isn't as good as his previous efforts....now it would be one thing if i said this book sucks, but that is not what i said, i merely suggested that so far, 35 pages into it, it isn't as good as other book...maybe after page 43 i will retract my previous statement...
i'm not one to review books at all, though...i think reading is a private matter and should be kept that way...i have nothing against book groups, as such, oprah selected some fine books (the reader, the posionwood bible, beloved) but i realy have no interest in discussing lit with anyone...
now american idol...i'll talk about that until the cows come home...
Reply
lets never discuss literature, chip chism. it's such an artfag thing to do anyway.
meanwhile, on american idol. who do you thinks getting the boot this week based on last weeks performance.
Reply
actually it's fun to discuss lit sometimes...when i was in grad school i HAD to join those damned study groups and what i hated was that folks always pointed out the blatantly obvious.."i think kozinsky is using symbolism here..." wow...that's an insight...
(missed that old 97s reference, huh?)
Reply
Leave a comment