(Untitled)

Jun 05, 2004 21:44

>.>

My brother's friends just said that a sarissa was 30-40 feet long.

[Note: Sarissa was primary weapon of the phalanx-guys. Think long spear implented by Philip and Alexander.]

Does that sound illogical to you?

Or am I completely brain damaged?

Anyway, I feel insulted by their stupidity.

Leave a comment

Comments 7

derryderrydown June 5 2004, 19:10:31 UTC
Hee! They are a bit off - seventeen to twenty-one feet was the normal length, with Alexander's troops tending towards the shorter end of the scale.

Reply

asuras June 5 2004, 19:11:24 UTC
That's what I thought.

Can you imaigne running around with a 40 foot spear? >D It'd probably drag in the dirt or something equally undignified.

Reply


teza June 5 2004, 19:14:24 UTC
Oh, no. It was only about 20 feet long.

(hah. only.)

Reply


oh SO predictable selfinduced June 6 2004, 00:49:54 UTC
la la la brain only registering the 'feet' and 'long' and 'Alexander' and 'phalanx' la la la

Reply


liaexmachina June 6 2004, 14:57:36 UTC
Twenty feet was the pre-Alexander standard.

Reply


deerlike June 14 2004, 22:00:24 UTC
*blinks* My mind barely registered the words "long spear" before devolving into...smuttyness. Also, somehow I misread "think" as "thick".

...damn it, the doctors swore it'd be a temporary thing!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up