I diverted a discussion over on MsRowen's livejournal because of my concern over alcoholism. I implied a biological component to alcoholism (or more accurately disagreed that alcoholics "desire" alcohol) and she replied with this link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rat_ParkRead more... )
Comments 4
I roll my eyes at people who insist that one model is THE TRUTH. The biological adherents who insist that alcoholics are born, not developed...and the environmental people who say there's no biological component...etc. I'm totally convinced that the models are over-simplifications that might be somewhat useful in some settings but don't even BEGIN to get at the "truth".
So I would argue with vehemently with your dissing people who use the phrase "become an alcoholic".
Reply
Reply
And it was obvious that my casual understanding had missed a major view point, so I wanted to know if there are other views out there I'm missing.
Someday I want to know more, but these days no time!
Reply
the familial/genetic stuff is i suppose what one would refer to as the inheritance model ?
neither are givens - there are lots of models.
Reply
Leave a comment