The scene: I sit down at my computer with a wee bit of the Glenlivet Nadurra, angels dancing on my tongue, and I think, "Other folks on the f-list must love single malts as much as we. I should use 'the power of teh Internets (tm
( Read more... )
Alas, my scotch is a subset of yours, but I'm also a huge fan of the peatier scotches. I currently have Lagavulin 16 Year and an Auchentoshan of unknown (and therefor probably not that astounding) age.
Note, I am not a scotch drinker by nature. That said, try Longmorn the next time you find yourself in a fine drinking establishment that carries it. It's not bad.
A lot of scotches (and hard liquor in general) seem to have a effervescent almost perfumey texture to them. Not literally flowery but it's like an inhalation of aerosol to my mouth. Also there is the burn factor. I know the high test stuff is going to burn, that's a given. But, like chili, the quality of the burn matters to me. There are grades to it. In chili there is mild, warm, slow burn, hot, and "My God,my God. Why Hast Thou Forsaken Me"? The majority of my experiences with scotch are of the latter two. Longmorn less so, maybe because it's peaty (if I recall correctly) that it seems to cut the "burn for burn's sake" heat and it's a bit less vaporous. On the warm, slow burn side I recently had the distinct pleasure of having some 52 year single malt (I forget the label but might be able to find it). That was just pure warmth, smoothness and beauty to my taste. So maybe it's that my scotch palate is just wayyy out of my price range;)
I have a very strong preference for Islay malts. I am often considered a heretic by many younger malt fans, as my preferred was of taking my malt, especially this time of year, is not neat. No, I am a big fan of the classic toddy. Most people don't know it, but before prohibition, the most common way for men of taste to indulge in a fine scotch was a well made toddy. The classic recipe is to dissolve half a teaspoon of sugar in 3oz hot water, add a jigger of fine malt, and grate some fresh nutmeg on top. I highly recommend it.
Thanks huruma! Many palates are better than one. And ask if you could ask him why are what in particular distinguishes what he likes, I would be most grateful. :)
Comments 20
Reply
Reply
That said, try Longmorn the next time you find yourself in a fine drinking establishment that carries it. It's not bad.
Reply
Reply
The majority of my experiences with scotch are of the latter two. Longmorn less so, maybe because it's peaty (if I recall correctly) that it seems to cut the "burn for burn's sake" heat and it's a bit less vaporous.
On the warm, slow burn side I recently had the distinct pleasure of having some 52 year single malt (I forget the label but might be able to find it). That was just pure warmth, smoothness and beauty to my taste. So maybe it's that my scotch palate is just wayyy out of my price range;)
Reply
Reply
Well then, never mind.
Reply
And now I set you on fire. *scritch*
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment