011

Apr 30, 2011 23:01

[Public | Audio]I've mentioned a friend I once had. He was an idealist and possessed a sense of honor worthy of Pythias or Regulus, a man that would keep his word even if it led to his own destruction ( Read more... )

plot: aftermath, c: the glass of fashion, c: ruthless goddess of distress, c: one man's insanity, plot: adam

Leave a comment

Comments 68

[Private] - audio leadsthestars May 1 2011, 12:16:10 UTC
Yes, you may.

Reply

[Private] majorum_pride May 1 2011, 17:16:42 UTC
Might I meet with you somewhere private to do so?

Reply

[Private] leadsthestars May 1 2011, 20:00:24 UTC
Why?

Reply

[Private] majorum_pride May 2 2011, 06:01:47 UTC
It has to do with a personal matter and I no longer trust this device not to twist my own words against me.

I mean you no harm, if that's your concern.

Reply


no_exaggeration May 1 2011, 16:40:42 UTC
Flaws aren't always a weakness, they make us-- [...Human. Yeah screw that saying.] Normal.

Reply

majorum_pride May 1 2011, 17:22:51 UTC
Yes, but I come from a culture where the concept of "normal" is exactly the opposite of everything we strive for.

I would rather not be normal. [But he has a better appreciation for what she went through.] Whatever is binding me here, I doubt it's a lack of idealism. Many wardens seem to function just as well without it.

Reply

no_exaggeration May 2 2011, 16:38:23 UTC
Well you can't be perfect.

Reply

majorum_pride May 3 2011, 04:28:32 UTC
I'm not human, though. I can't be satisfied without seeking constant self-improvement, whether I can be perfect or not.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

[Private] majorum_pride May 2 2011, 06:07:12 UTC
Which part? The incident itself, outside of a sore ankle, I've fully recovered from.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

[Private] majorum_pride May 2 2011, 07:35:42 UTC
Mens agitat molem. The assertion isn't so much for you as it is for me.

I do. That sentiment was genuine, if inappropriately expressed.

Reply


[Private] timesbureaucrat May 2 2011, 21:37:56 UTC
You said little to me, but I'll respect your privacy and I'm good at keeping secrets, [up until it's more useful to spread them] but I want to know...why did you write that letter to me?

Reply

[Private] majorum_pride May 2 2011, 21:52:47 UTC
[He's a little frowny over the fact that he wanted so very much to die. So he doesn't want to admit that he did.] What's the difference between having nothing to lose or nothing to gain?

Reply

Re: [Private] timesbureaucrat May 2 2011, 22:07:51 UTC
Quite a lot I should imagine, since the former implies that one has nothing one needs and so any chance of improvement, no matter how small, is worth the risk. Whereas the latter implies that one has, if not everything, at least enough that taking foolish risks is less desirable an option.

Reply

[Private] majorum_pride May 3 2011, 04:11:34 UTC
That's why I wrote the letter then, and wouldn't now. But it doesn't change the validity of the statement.

You spoke highly of your people. Let me tell you about mine as I knew them.

A scientist by the name of Paul Museveni was a follower of the ideals of Nietzsche, who wanted to create the Übermensch. He went to a world with about 3,000 followers. 3,000 brilliant minds and individuals of exceptional ability who all donated their DNA, their research, their architecture, and their collected knowledge into the formation of their dream ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up