Reply to your criticism.salvationofkaneMarch 29 2005, 13:28:31 UTC
1.) Ragnor isn't a lord; he's a knight. Decent difference. 2.) He was there because he left his soldiers to follow him. Ragnor wanted to get to the city first, then have a few days' rest before he marched the dolts into the city. It didn't work that way. 3.) Zhane knighted Ragnor, and R. became his father figure shortly thereafter. It was also the souring of this relationship that caused Ragnor to leave the city five years before. 4.) Ragnor (a.k.a. "Luke") and Willow had not seen one another in four years because his last visit to Galahad from his post on the region's border was for the birth of his son, Seth. (Seth and his grandfather visit Ragnor regularly, but Willow does not.) 5.) I'll work on the surroundings. Honestly, though, you don't want to know the smell part in Galahad. At least, not in some parts
( ... )
Comments 1
2.) He was there because he left his soldiers to follow him. Ragnor wanted to get to the city first, then have a few days' rest before he marched the dolts into the city. It didn't work that way.
3.) Zhane knighted Ragnor, and R. became his father figure shortly thereafter. It was also the souring of this relationship that caused Ragnor to leave the city five years before.
4.) Ragnor (a.k.a. "Luke") and Willow had not seen one another in four years because his last visit to Galahad from his post on the region's border was for the birth of his son, Seth. (Seth and his grandfather visit Ragnor regularly, but Willow does not.)
5.) I'll work on the surroundings. Honestly, though, you don't want to know the smell part in Galahad. At least, not in some parts ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment