Leave a comment

Comments 14

gnibbles August 2 2010, 22:05:24 UTC
That was so cute! :D

Reply


kelkyag August 2 2010, 22:26:28 UTC
An interesting little parable.

Reply


desireearmfeldt August 2 2010, 23:11:37 UTC
On reflection, I'm not quite sure I get the middle argument: why is the thing you have more of and can't trade away worth more than the thing you have less of and can trade away?

Reply

firstfrost August 3 2010, 00:13:14 UTC
I think the argument is more that the thing you have more of and can't trade away is worth more than the thing you have less of because you have already traded some of it away.

Reply

desireearmfeldt August 3 2010, 00:55:06 UTC
But that doesn't make sense, because they're comparing 1 unit to 1 unit, not "all you've got" to "all you've got."

Reply

firstfrost August 3 2010, 01:03:56 UTC
Yes, but one of the metrics for the one unit seems to be how may more it earns you total.

Reply


fredrickegerman August 3 2010, 01:18:35 UTC
Now I'm bugged by whether this is any of the Daniel Abrahams I actually know.

Reply

firstfrost August 3 2010, 01:41:20 UTC
I was assuming that it was the one who writes books I like. :)

Reply

marcusmarcusrc August 3 2010, 02:00:57 UTC
Yes. I was looking up something about War of Autumn, and came across this story...

Reply


Leave a comment

Up