So, I was writing an unreasonably lengthy comment over at
ontd_politicaland I realized I should probably just post about it, along with some other, vaguely lady-related things that have been bothering me.
Firstly, this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/education/11gender.html (
single-sex education. )
Comments 4
Reply
My brother (a decidedly not-ex gay) sent me the article, which is more like attempted advice, really, and I started reading it expecting to be outraged by the complete wrong-headedness with regard to homosexuality. I was, but I really focused on the sexism, mostly because it was so out of left field.
I guess I was anticipating more "you are against God", "homosexuality is a choice", and "don't succumb to the sinful 'alternative lifestyle'" type of reasoning, not "a relationship between two men will never work because a successful couple must consist of a strong, protective, 'courageous warrior' and his weak, encouraging, precious woman".
I mean, a certain (gargantuan)amount of crazy goes along with the whole ex-gay movement, but that assumption took it to a whole nother level.
Reply
Reply
Ugh.
That article isn't really about that, though. It's by an "ex-gay" who says all his relationships with men didn't allow him to experience "God's fullness" because only a female can fill the role of "personal cheerleader" that every man needs to complement their "courageous warrior".
Reply
Leave a comment