Not long ago being bi-lingual (able to speak Spanish) was of little benefit to me and I wondered if knowing it would ever serve any purpose. In fact I rarely heard Spanish spoken and would actually get a little excited upon hearing it spoken in public. Who would have imagined the rapid change in all of that
(
Read more... )
Comments 12
if/when I go to a foreign country--I wouldnt expect
peeps to speak english----its my thing to try to speak their language.
I better not say more or I will piss peeps off-----
huggszzzzz Mark
loves ya
cory
Reply
Speak English, slowly, clearly, and without all the slang. Don't raise the volume like they are deaf.
If no communication occurs, then *SMILE*, it's the universal language!
{cory}
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
I don't think that concept ever actually existed. When English-speaking people first came to Georgia, for instance, very few of them made the effort to speak Cherokee. They didn't need to, because they were able to make their own English-speaking areas and they got lazy.
The change, of course, is that at most other points in history, immigration was closely tied to colonization, and was the province of the linguistically and socially empowered. Now, immigration is primarily tied to a kind of refuge, so most immigrants are disenfranchised in both their former homes and their new homes. So now when immigrants preserve their language, it's seen as taking upper-class privilege to which they are not entitled.
Reply
I believe future historians will record this time period as the most rapid conversion to a bi-lingual nation the world has ever seen, enflamed by modern technology, commercialism, and NAFTA. I see way too many “economic” refugees driving SUV’s - pobrecitos.
Reply
I believe future historians will record this time period as the most rapid conversion to a bi-lingual nation the world has ever seen,My guess is that honor would go to Israel. The USA might be the most rapid conversion to a mono-lingual nation, though. It also might be the largest country with one primary language for private use. China has two major ones, Mandarin and Cantonese, not even counting Tibetan and other local languages. India has ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
(or the way the Iroquois felt when the French settled in 'New France'.)
Happily most people speak both languages in Montreal now - a great thing to be able to go to the theatre in either language, to read great literature and to understand both cultures.
One day all Atlantans will be able to read Pablo Neruda and Gabriel Garcia Marquez in America's second great language.
Here in Vancouver ("Van-Kong") 28% of the population is Chinese-Canadian - and 0ver 50% of the graduating class at Simon Fraser University was Asian - now there's a challenge.
Un abrazo
Reply
I fear, post NAFTA, that the Hispanic population has and will continue to have no incentive to melt in linguistically with the rest of the country. Every ethnic group maintains their cultural identity as a proud link to their past.
I can see this causing enormous political, social, and economic strains in the future. I know these feelings are inconsistent with my experience and exposure to other languages. It scares me that there is less and less that units us.
Reply
Leave a comment