Umm, looks like Hayek was a socialist after all...
in the current GOP definition anyway.
Security and Freedom (from the Road to Serfdom)
----
There is no reason why, in a society which has reached the general level of wealth ours has, (the certainty of a given minimum of sustenance) should not be guaranteed to all without endangering general freedom; that is: some minimum of food, shelter and clothing ( Read more... )
Security and Freedom (from the Road to Serfdom)
----
There is no reason why, in a society which has reached the general level of wealth ours has, (the certainty of a given minimum of sustenance) should not be guaranteed to all without endangering general freedom; that is: some minimum of food, shelter and clothing ( Read more... )
Comments 1
(The comment has been removed)
I don't think GOP definition requires that constraint. There, any redistribution is socialism :)
Reply
Leave a comment