(Untitled)

Mar 13, 2006 01:18

For fun times, visit:
http://www.glennferon.com/portfolio1/index.html

Some of the portraits this artist touches up are merely to heighten saturation, but the ones where he colors in women's makeup and smoothes the skin tone to the point of losing definition...that's just scary. People mainly don't look that way.
After visiting this site [shown to us ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 3

idiosyncrarchy March 13 2006, 07:43:44 UTC
there's a few where the changes are just creepy, or weird. like #21 where he slims the model's waist down to a ridiculous level and also changes the line of her bikini bottom so it's closer to a thong. #4 again slimming the waist in seemingly random fasion. then #12 where he brings the woman's jean shorts up a little so they cover more of her butt. #43 where the woman seems to have some cool tattoing in the 'before' shot which he just wipes out ticks me off a bit, but #30 and #02 are just hilarious, to go between 'before' and 'after' quickly and see the breasts and behinds go from normal to swollen and back.

Reply

Barbie Calendar marzipanzee March 13 2006, 08:01:49 UTC
Isn't it disturbingly fun to watch the flesh plumpen [a word?]? The unnatural shaving off of flesh just looks stupid, plus I can't stand the way the artist smoothes out the skin tone and brightens it to the extent that the portrait looks more cartoon than human.
The tattoo shots make me the angriest, though--because they are so much a part of the woman's [Erikah Badu?] beauty.

All of this work is done by a man who charges $100/hour.

Reply


yblehs March 13 2006, 23:49:18 UTC
My favorites are the ones where he makes the ass/tits bigger and the clothing smaller. Which is to say, all of them.

Really, a lot of them would have been a great deal nicer on their own if they had just gotten a better photo taken in the first place.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up