"And then there's Walid Phares, who insists that Zawahiri represents the views not only of the majority of jihadists, but - if I heard him correctly (I'll check the transcript when it's published) - of most Arabs and Muslims. How bizarre, hearing an America-based pundit lecturing al-Jazeera about how popular and influential bin Laden and al-
(
Read more... )
Comments 10
Reply
I think this specific case holds true for your description. I'm not sure, however, if almost exact parallel ideas of an inevitable clash of civilizations in parts of the right (in fairness, this has been adopted by parts of the American left also) and the Jihadist branch of Salafism are adequately explained.
Reply
By this interpretation, the parallels would stem from the outsiders understanding the source for the Jihadist doctrine and seeing that as the most plausible interpretation... and as the most plausible, one that will be difficult to exorcise from Islam. Whether or not that's a fair assessment of Islamic theology is really up to popular and influential Islamic theologians (not simply theologians who study Islam, but ones who subscribe to it... a point I wish I didn't have to make, but the strange world of modern religious studies forces me to).
Reply
"I dont care"
Reply
..i just did and it's kinda comfy.
Reply
Leave a comment