Part of last night's Church History lecture was on constructions of "orthodoxy" and "heresy" in the early Church. I found myself getting a bit frustrated at some points, as the Gnostics were portrayed in a rather favorable light at times, and people like Irenaeus were portrayed as deceptive and slight hypocrites because he came up with a new,
(
Read more... )
Comments 11
Reply
That's a really good point. But I think these things (to a very limited extent), point to some sort of truth that one adheres to.
There IS a Truth out there, and he even named himself as such.
Ben has this wonderful conception of God as Truth, thus characterizing Truth as a being - something one can interact with. It seems like you're kind of thinking along the same wavelength. :-) (Oooooh...wavelength....math...physics...withdrawl...)
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
I hate it when that happens. I think neither side can claim "orthodoxy."
Part of me is starting to wonder if any one can truly claim "orthodoxy"...
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Right. But at the same time, there do seem to be some rather fundamental things that we know.
I feel that the only force that allows paradox is Christ crucified. There's your "middle ground."
Amen!
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment