Ever since I've gotten into psychology, I've always been drawn to evolutionary psych--probably because it answers a lot of questions that I've always had. These are questions that, as far as I can tell, most people don't think about, but that, whenever my mind wanders to thinking about them, really seem to haunt me. It's like, my mind can't wrap
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
Reply
And I loved your comment :), especially your Kansas analogy. Steve Pinker once talked about this stuff--like, just because a brain is incapable of comprehending something doesn't mean it isn't real (i.e. our "infinity" is like a dog's "Mean Girls")--in one of his classes I took. But going with the animal analogy, I guess the major difference is that we are capable of knowing (some of) what we don't know, whereas other animals lack this metacognition and are thus able to live blissful lives of poop and Kibbles and Bits. Hmm, this begs the question: is it better to be a dissatisfied human, or a satisfied pig? ;-)
Maybe I'll go look for some Pinker books and flip through em...Or maybe we should take justice online the next time it's offered...?
Reply
- Rainer Maria Rilke
Reply
"J.D. Salinger alludes to Rilke in various works, including the novel Franny and Zooey and the short story A Perfect Day for Bananafish."
!!!
Also, did you read this quote in Niffenegger?]
I love it. I might use it in my personal statement.
Reply
Leave a comment